ArticleScientific reports2018
Investigation of 12 X-STR loci in Mongolian and Eastern Han populations of China with comparison to other populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Polymorphisms and Forensic Efficiencies of a Set of Novel Autosomal InDel Markers in a Chinese Mongolian Group.BioMed research international · 2020Trial
- An X-STRs analysis of the Iraqi Sorani Kurds.PloS one · 2023Article
- Genetic polymorphisms of 16 X-STR loci in the Hani population from Southwest China.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- X-chromosomal STR based genetic polymorphisms and demographic history of Sri Lankan ethnicities and their relationship with global populations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Next generation sequencing of a set of ancestry-informative SNPs: ancestry assignment of three continental populations and estimating ancestry composition for Mongolians.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020Article
- Multiple genetic analyses to investigate the polymorphisms of Chinese Mongolian population with an efficient short tandem repeat panel.Croatian medical journal · 2019Article
- A set of novel SNP loci for differentiating continental populations and three Chinese populations.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the unique inheritance pattern, X-chromosomal short tandem repeats (X-STRs) have several advantages in complex kinship cases, such as deficiency cases or grandparent-grandchild and half-sisters testing. In our study, 541 unrelated individuals gathered from Mongolian and Eastern Chinese Han populations were successfully genotyped using the Investigator Argus X-12 kit. We calculated allele/haplotype frequencies and other forensic parameters of the two populations and further explored their genetic distance with already published Chinese populations and six global populations. Our results showed that the 12 X-STR markers were highly informative in the two populations when compared with nine other Chinese populations: significant differences were found at several loci. Geographically neighboring populations or different ethnic groups within the same area appeared to have closer evolutionary relationships. We also analyzed population genetic structure by performing clustering with the STRUCTURE program and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA), and we found that the Chinese and other populations enrolled in this study could be distinguished. Furthermore, Mongolian males were distinguishable from the other studied males by a moderate genetic distance. Our study also expanded the X-STR database, which could facilitate the appropriate application of the 12 X-STR markers in the forensic field in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.