Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523809›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Factors associated with prostate specific antigen testing in Australians: Analysis of the New South Wales 45 and Up Study.

Visalini Nair-Shalliker, Albert Bang, Marianne Weber, David E Goldsbury, Michael Caruana, Jon Emery, Emily Banks, Karen Canfell, Dianne L O'Connell, David P Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Incidence profile of four major cancers among migrants in Australia, 2005-2014.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Visalini Nair-ShallikerCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Albert BangCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marianne WeberCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David E GoldsburyCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael CaruanaCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-6552
Jon EmeryDepartment of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne. Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emily BanksNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Karen CanfellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dianne L O'ConnellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David P SmithCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. dsmith@nswcc.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-3214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia has one of the highest incidence rates of prostate cancer (PC) worldwide, due in part to widespread prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. We aimed to identify factors associated with PSA testing in Australian men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer or prior prostate disease. Participants were men joining the 45 and Up Study in 2006-2009, aged ≥45 years at recruitment. Self-completed questionnaires were linked to cancer registrations, hospitalisations, health services data and deaths. Men with a history of PC, radical prostatectomy or a "monitoring" PSA test for prostate disease were excluded. We identified Medicare reimbursed PSA tests during 2012-2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the association between having PSA tests and factors of interest. Of the 62,765 eligible men, 51.8% had at least one screening PSA test during 2012-2014. Factors strongly associated with having a PSA test included having 27+ general practitioner consultations (versus 3-9 consultations; OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.90-2.11), benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment (versus none; OR = 1.59(95%CI = 1.49-1.70), aged 60-69 years (versus 50-59 years; OR = 1.54; 95%CI = 1.48-1.60). These results emphasise the important role of primary care in decision making about PSA testing.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFacilities and Services UtilizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29523809
PMCPMC5844910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.