Publisher Correction: Mammalian display screening of diverse cystine-dense peptides for difficult to drug targets.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Strategies for Heterologous Expression, Synthesis, and Purification of Animal Venom Toxins.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
   Review
2. Isolation of antigen-specific, disulphide-rich knob domain peptides from bovine antibodies.PLoS biology · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Mammalian display screening of diverse cystine-dense peptides for difficult to drug targets.2017

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Funding

Abstract