Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523502›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

A Skin Cancer Prevention Facial-Aging Mobile App for Secondary Schools in Brazil: Appearance-Focused Interventional Study.

Titus Josef Brinker, Marlene Heckl, Martina Gatzka, Markus V Heppt, Henrique Resende Rodrigues, Sven Schneider, Wiebke Sondermann, Carolina de Almeida E Silva, Michael C Kirchberger, Joachim Klode and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Golfers' Interest in Multilevel Sun-Protection Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Titus Josef BrinkerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-5919
Marlene HecklDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Munich, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-3689
Martina GatzkaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergic Diseases, Ulm University Hospital, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6520-9794
Markus V HepptDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Munich, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-1825
Henrique Resende RodriguesSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-9543
Sven SchneiderMannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-1971
Wiebke SondermannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-3523
Carolina de Almeida E SilvaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-2844
Michael C KirchbergerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-3009
Joachim KlodeDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9239-7014
Alexander H EnkDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-185X
Sarah KnispelDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-113X
Christof von KalleDepartment of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-3297
Ingo StoffelsDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-1303
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-7858
Yasuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-5818
Stefan EsserDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-9650
Aisllan AssisSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1727-4211
Breno Bernardes-SouzaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1806-2501
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of melanoma is increasing faster than any other major cancer both in Brazil and worldwide. Southeast Brazil has especially high incidences of melanoma, and early detection is low. Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a primary risk factor for developing melanoma. Increasing attractiveness is a major motivation among adolescents for tanning. A medical student-delivered intervention that takes advantage of the broad availability of mobile phones and adolescents' interest in their appearance indicated effectiveness in a recent study from Germany. However, the effect in a high-UV index country with a high melanoma prevalence and the capability of medical students to implement such an intervention remain unknown.

objectiveIn this pilot study, our objective was to investigate the preliminary success and implementability of a photoaging intervention to prevent skin cancer in Brazilian adolescents.

methodsWe implemented a free photoaging mobile phone app (Sunface) in 15 secondary school classes in southeast Brazil. Medical students "mirrored" the pupils' altered 3-dimensional (3D) selfies reacting to touch on tablets via a projector in front of their whole grade accompanied by a brief discussion of means of UV protection. An anonymous questionnaire capturing sociodemographic data and risk factors for melanoma measured the perceptions of the intervention on 5-point Likert scales among 356 pupils of both sexes (13-19 years old; median age 16 years) in grades 8 to 12 of 2 secondary schools in Brazil.

resultsWe measured more than 90% agreement in both items that measured motivation to reduce UV exposure and only 5.6% disagreement: 322 (90.5%) agreed or strongly agreed that their 3D selfie motivated them to avoid using a tanning bed, and 321 (90.2%) that it motivated them to improve their sun protection; 20 pupils (5.6%) disagreed with both items. The perceived effect on motivation was higher in female pupils in both tanning bed avoidance (n=198, 92.6% agreement in females vs n=123, 87.2% agreement in males) and increased use of sun protection (n=197, 92.1% agreement in females vs n=123, 87.2% agreement in males) and independent of age or skin type. All medical students involved filled in a process evaluation revealing that they all perceived the intervention as effective and unproblematic, and that all pupils tried the app in their presence.

conclusionsThe photoaging intervention was effective in changing behavioral predictors for UV protection in Brazilian adolescents. The predictors measured indicated an even higher prospective effectiveness in southeast Brazil than in Germany (>90% agreement in Brazil vs >60% agreement in Germany to both items that measured motivation to reduce UV exposure) in accordance with the theory of planned behavior. Medical students are capable of complete implementation. A randomized controlled trial measuring prospective effects in Brazil is planned as a result of this study.

Indexed as

adolescentmobile applicationsprimary preventionschoolsskin agingskin neoplasmssmartphonestudents, medical

Identifiers

PMID29523502
PMCPMC5866300
OpenAlexW2793301415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.