ArticleMethods in enzymology2018
Integrating Experimental and In Silico HTS in the Discovery of Inhibitors of Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Decrypting a Cryptic Allosteric Pocket inCommunications chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discovery of novel tool compounds and drug leads against a range of unorthodox protein targets has pushed both experimental screening methodologies as well as the field of structure-based design to the limit in recent years. Increasingly, it has been recognized that some of the most desirable targets for the development of small-molecule effectors are actually protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. There are numerous nontrivial challenges to pursuing small-molecule lead compounds directed toward PPIs and PNIs: relatively shallow cavities, large surface areas that are natively complexed to macromolecules, complex patterns of interstitial waters, a paucity of "hot spots," large conformational changes upon ligand binding, etc. Although there have been some notable successes targeting PPIs in the last decade, there has been distinctly less success in the realm of targeting PNIs. This chapter focuses on an approach, successfully applied by our group to address the challenge of gaining traction on the PPI target RAD52, which is a protein that binds both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA, and is an anticancer target for certain types of cancer. There are many approaches to tackling the difficult problems of finding effective small molecules that disrupt PPIs and PNIs, but the methods presented here offer a series of elegant solutions, which integrate experimental HTS, biophysical methods, docking, and molecular dynamics in a powerful way. Additionally, the structural knowledge gained from these studies provides a means for rationally understanding what features lead to ligand affinity in these fascinating and highly unorthodox pockets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.