Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523210›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Survey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' infection in cattle in Africa with special reference to Ethiopia.

Sori Teshale, Dirk Geysen, Gobena Ameni, Pierre Dorny, Dirk Berkvens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Detection ofVeterinary medicine international · 2024
    Article
  8. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sori TeshaleAddis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Bishoftu, Ethiopia. teshalesori2002@yahoo.com.
Dirk GeysenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gobena AmeniAddis Ababa University, Akililu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pierre DornyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dirk BerkvensDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs evidence of the infection of domestic animals by Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' is presently becoming available, understanding the epidemiological and ecological significance of infection is important to quantify the clinical and socio-economic impact of the diseases they cause.

methodsThe first aim of this study was to analyse the occurrence of A. phagocytophilum and Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' in cattle samples collected from selected African countries using a polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme fragment length polymorphism. Secondly, this study was aimed at the molecular identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. infection in ruminants raised under different production systems in selected sites in central Ethiopia.

resultsIn total, 695 samples from cattle in six African countries were analysed. Overall, 45 positive results were obtained for Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' (6.47%) and 19 for A. phagocytophilum (2.73%). Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' was detected in all countries except Tanzania while A. phagocytophilum was detected only in samples from Ethiopia. The proportion of samples tested positive for Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' ranged from 1.2% in Morocco to 16% in Rwanda. The occurrence of both agents is now confirmed in African cattle. For the survey in Ethiopia a semi-nested 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism was used for the identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. in blood samples. Randomly selected samples were also analysed by pCS20 polymerase chain reaction for the detection of E. ruminantium. Positive results were obtained for E. ruminantium and five species of Anaplasma including a zoonotic species. To our knowledge, this is the first report of infection of domestic ruminants with A. phagocytophilum, A. ovis and Anaplasma sp. 'Omatjenne' in Ethiopia.

conclusionThe present study showed widespread occurrence of Anaplasma sp. 'Omatijenne' in African cattle and five Anaplasma species in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnimalsBloodCattleCattle DiseasesDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisEthiopiaPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAfricaAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasma sp.CattleEthiopia‘Omatjenne’

Identifiers

PMID29523210
PMCPMC5845267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.