Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523198›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2018

Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines.

Ludovica De Panfilis, Roberto Satolli, Massimo Costantini

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Procedures for application of the extended dosing after antitumor drug clinical trials.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Ethics codes and use of new and innovative drugs.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ludovica De PanfilisDirezione Scientifica, AUSL di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Viale Umberto I 50, Reggio Emilia, Italy. Ludovica.depanfilis@ausl.re.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-7626
Roberto SatolliComitato Etico dell'Area Vasta Emilia Nord, Viale Umberto I 50, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Massimo CostantiniDirezione Scientifica, AUSL di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Viale Umberto I 50, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP. MAIN BODY: The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion.

conclusionsIn an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient's quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the "simultaneous care" approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC's assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesEthics CommitteesEthics, MedicalAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Merkel CellCommunicationCompassionate Use TrialsDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareEmpathyEthical AnalysisHopeHumansItalyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedavelumabCancerCompassionate use programsEthics committeeQuality of lifeRight to hopeSimultaneous palliative care

Identifiers

PMID29523198
PMCPMC5845200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.