Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523184›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

The long sepsis journey in low- and middle-income countries begins with a first step...but on which road?

Arthur Kwizera, Inipavudu Baelani, Mervyn Mer, Niranjan Kissoon, Marcus J Schultz, Andrew J Patterson, Ndidiamaka Musa, Joseph Christopher Farmer, Martin W Dünser, Sepsis in Resource-Limited Settings Workgroup of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Antibiotic Stewardship: Dead Bugs do not Mutate.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arthur KwizeraIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Makerere University College of Health Sciences and Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Inipavudu BaelaniDepartment of Anesthesia, Doctors On Call for Service (DOCS) Education Hospital, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Mervyn MerIntensive Care Unit, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Niranjan KissoonBC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Marcus J SchultzAcademic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew J PattersonDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Ndidiamaka MusaSeattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Joseph Christopher FarmerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, USA.
Martin W DünserDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria. Martin.Duenser@i-med.ac.at.
Sepsis in Resource-Limited Settings Workgroup of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHumansSepsisInfectionLow-income countriesMiddle-income countriesOrgan dysfunctionPreventionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29523184
PMCPMC5845219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.