Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523138›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.

Thomas Benz, Susanne Lehmann, Andreas R Gantenbein, Peter S Sandor, Walter F Stewart, Achim Elfering, André G Aeschlimann, Felix Angst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04877561 (Translation, Trans-cultural Adaptations and Test-retest Reliability of the Headache Disability Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04877561 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Translation, Trans-cultural Adaptations and Test-retest Reliability of the Headache Disability Questionnaire (HDQ)

TypeobservationalSponsorZurich University of Applied SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsHeadache Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Translation and validation of the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4) in an Italian clinical cohort.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas BenzRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland. t.benz@rehaclinic.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6538-0022
Susanne LehmannRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Andreas R GantenbeinRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Peter S SandorRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Walter F StewartResearch and Development, Sutter Health, Concord, California, USA.
Achim ElferingInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
André G AeschlimannRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Felix AngstRehabilitation Clinic "RehaClinic", Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) is a brief questionnaire and measures headache-related disability. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the original English version of the MIDAS to German and to test its reliability.

methodsThe standardized translation process followed international guidelines. The pre-final version was tested for clarity and comprehensibility by 34 headache sufferers. Test-retest reliability of the final version was quantified by 36 headache patients completing the MIDAS twice with an interval of 48 h. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients and internal consistency by Cronbach's α.

resultsAll steps of the translation process were followed, documented and approved by the developer of the MIDAS. The expert committee discussed in detail the complex phrasing of the questions that refer to one to another, especially exclusion of headache-days from one item to the next. The German version contains more active verb sentences and prefers the perfect to the imperfect tense. The MIDAS scales intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.884 to 0.994 and was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.982-0.995) for the MIDAS total score. Cronbach's α for the MIDAS as a whole was 0.69 at test and 0.67 at retest.

conclusionsThe translation process was challenged by the comprehensibility of the questionnaire. The German version of the MIDAS is a highly reliable instrument for assessing headache related disability with moderate internal consistency. Provided validity testing of the German MIDAS is successful, it can be recommended for use in clinical practice as well as in research.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationTranslationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-cultural adaptationGermanMIDASReliability

Identifiers

PMID29523138
PMCPMC5845367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.