Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523116›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

NSCLC molecular testing in Central and Eastern European countries.

Ales Ryska, Peter Berzinec, Luka Brcic, Tanja Cufer, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Maya Gottfried, Ilona Kovalszky, Włodzimierz Olszewski, Buge Oz, Lukas Plank and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer in Hungary.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Testing forOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Review
  17. Lung cancer biomarker testing: perspective from Europe.Translational lung cancer research · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ales RyskaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. ryskaale@gmail.com.
Peter BerzinecDepartment of Oncology, Specialised Hospital of St Zoerardus Zobor, Nitra, Slovakia.
Luka BrcicInstitute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Tanja CuferMedical Faculty Ljubljana, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Rafal DziadziuszkoMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Maya GottfriedMeir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Ilona Kovalszky1st Institute of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Włodzimierz OlszewskiInstitute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Buge OzCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lukas PlankDepartment of Pathology, Comenius University, Jessenius Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.
Jozsef Timar1st Institute of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Pfizer Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of targeted treatments for subsets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted the importance of accurate molecular diagnosis to determine if an actionable genetic alteration is present. Few data are available for Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) on mutation rates, testing rates, and compliance with testing guidelines.

methodsA questionnaire about molecular testing and NSCLC management was distributed to relevant specialists in nine CEE countries, and pathologists were asked to provide the results of EGFR and ALK testing over a 1-year period.

resultsA very high proportion of lung cancer cases are confirmed histologically/cytologically (75-100%), and molecular testing of NSCLC samples has been established in all evaluated CEE countries in 2014. Most countries follow national or international guidelines on which patients to test for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements. In most centers at that time, testing was undertaken on request of the clinician rather than on the preferred reflex basis. Immunohistochemistry, followed by fluorescent in situ hybridization confirmation of positive cases, has been widely adopted for ALK testing in the region. Limited reimbursement is a significant barrier to molecular testing in the region and a disincentive to reflex testing. Multidisciplinary tumor boards are established in most of the countries and centers, with 75-100% of cases being discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board at specialized centers.

conclusionsMolecular testing is established throughout the CEE region, but improved and unbiased reimbursement remains a major challenge for the future. Increasing the number of patients reviewed by multidisciplinary boards outside of major centers and access to targeted therapy based on the result of molecular testing are other major challenges.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementMutationBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEuropeGenetic TestingHumansLung NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorALK rearrangementsCentral eastern European regionEGFR mutationsMolecular testingNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID29523116
PMCPMC5845184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.