Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523108›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2018

Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.

Mette Tranberg, Bodil Hammer Bech, Jan Blaakær, Jørgen Skov Jensen, Hans Svanholm, Berit Andersen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02680262 nacompletednot on this map

A Three-armed Randomised Controlled Trial of Non-participants in an Organised Cervical Cancer Screening Programme

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled9,327ConditionsCervical CancerArmsHPV self-sampling kit mailed directly, HPV self-sampling kit on demand, Second reminder
NCT05783167 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Self-collected Cervical Cancer Screening Samples for Detection of Human Papillomavirus in HIV-positive Women - a Pilot Study of Self-collected Vaginal and Urine Samples

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2023 to 2024Enrolled502ConditionsHIV Infections, HPV-Related Cervical Carcinoma, Cervical Cancer, Coinfection, HIVArmsSelf-sampling for HPV infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mette TranbergDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers, NØ, Denmark. mettrani@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6694
Bodil Hammer BechDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jan BlaakærDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Jørgen Skov JensenStatens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
Hans SvanholmDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers, NØ, Denmark.
Berit AndersenDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers, NØ, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman's home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder.

methodsIn this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30-64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days.

resultsParticipation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6-15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5-7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9-95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up.

conclusionsOffering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials NCT02680262 . Registered 10 February 2016.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationSelf CareAdultDenmarkEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPostal ServicePrevalencePrognosisResearch DesignCancer preventionCervical cancer screeningHuman papillomavirus testingScreening participationSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID29523108
PMCPMC5845195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.