Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523097›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2018

A digital assessment system for evaluating kinetic tremor in essential tremor and Parkinson's disease.

Po-Chieh Lin, Kai-Hsiang Chen, Bing-Shiang Yang, Yu-Jung Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The difference in visuomotor feedback velocity control during spiral drawing between Parkinson's disease and essential tremor.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Chieh LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu City, 30010, Taiwan.
Kai-Hsiang ChenNeurology Division, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, 300, Taiwan.
Bing-Shiang YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu City, 30010, Taiwan. bsyang@mail.nctu.edu.tw.
Yu-Jung ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu City, 30010, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 105-2628-E-009-003-MY3National Chiao Tung University (TW) and National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-chu Branch collaborative project 104W970 & 105W970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpiral drawing on papers is a common tremor evaluation tool for diagnosing patients with essential tremor (ET) or Parkinson's disease (PD). No standard drawing methods and parameters that use graphic tablets are yet available for objective evaluation.

methodsThis study established a tremor assessment system for tremor severity by using graphic tablets. Twelve patients with ET and twelve patients with PD were tested to establish system algorithms, and six additional patients were tested with the developed system to evaluate its performance. The patients also performed spiral drawing with three guiding paradigms on a graphic tablet: traced along a given spiral (S1), performed freehand drawing (S2), and traced along a guiding point (S3). Three parameters were calculated to quantify tremor severity: the means of radial difference per radian (|dr/dθ|), the means of radial difference per second (|dr/dt|), and the area under curve (AUC) of the frequency spectrum of the velocity. Each patient's drawing was also evaluated using a visual rating scale (VRS) by experienced physicians. The interrater reliability was examined to identify the most consistent test paradigm.

resultsThe parameter |dr/dθ| and AUC correlated well with the VRS (R > 0.8) in S1, S2 and S3 tests. The S1 test presented the best interrater reliability (Weighted Kappa coefficient, k = 0.80) among three tests. The Weighted Kappa coefficients are 0.67 and 0.71 in S2 and S3 tests, respectively.

conclusionsWe developed three different guiding paradigms for spiral drawing on a digital graphic tablet for clinical tests. Three parameters were calculated to represent the tremor severity in spiral drawing and used to quantify temporal and spatial characteristics of tremor, and provided good correlation with current clinical assessments. The test "traced along a given spiral" is recommended due to its good interrater reliability.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldMotor SkillsAgedEssential TremorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationParkinson DiseaseReproducibility of ResultsTremorClinical assessmentEssential tremorParkinson’s diseaseSpiral drawing

Identifiers

PMID29523097
PMCPMC5845296
OpenAlexW2800689030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.