Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523081›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

An application of restricted mean survival time in a competing risks setting: comparing time to ART initiation by injection drug use.

Keri L Calkins, Chelsea E Canan, Richard D Moore, Catherine R Lesko, Bryan Lau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Value-of-Information Framework for Personalizing the Timing of Surveillance Testing.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keri L CalkinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. kcalkins@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-9397
Chelsea E CananDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Richard D MooreDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Catherine R LeskoDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bryan LauDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical CohortU01DA036935 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, RICHARD DOUGLAS · 2014 to 2024
$14.9M
3/4 Alcohol Research Consortium in HIV - Epidemiological Research Arm (ARCH-ERA)U01AA020793 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M., LAU, BRYAN · 2011 to 2020
$5.8M
Johns Hopkins HIV Epidemiology and Prevention Sciences Training ProgramT32AI102623 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Shruti H Mehta · 2013 to 2026
$5.3M
Lung and HIV Analytical Data Coordinating Center (LHAD-CC)U01HL121812 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LAU, BRYAN · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases P30-AI094189National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases T32-AI102623NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL121812NHLBI NIH HHS U01-HL121812NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA020793NIAAA NIH HHS U01-AA020793NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI102623NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036935NIDA NIH HHS U01-DA036935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestricted mean survival time (RMST) is an underutilized estimand in time-to-event analyses. Herein, we highlight its strengths by comparing time to (1) all-cause mortality and (2) initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-infected persons who inject drugs (PWID) and persons who do not inject drugs.

methodsRMST to death was determined by integrating the Kaplan-Meier survival curve to 5 years of follow-up. To account for the competing risks of death and loss-to-clinic when estimating time to ART, we calculated RMST to ART initiation by estimating the area between the survival curve for ART initiation and the cumulative incidence curve for death or loss-to-clinic. We standardized all curves using inverse probability of exposure weights.

resultsWe followed 3044 HIV-positive, ART-naive persons from enrollment into the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort from 1996 to 2014. PWID had a - 0.19 year (95% confidence interval (CI): - 0.29, - 0.10) difference in survival over 5 years of follow-up compared to persons who did not inject drugs. There was no difference between the two groups in time not on ART while alive and in clinic (RMST difference = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.10, 0.36).

conclusionsPWID have similar expected time to ART initiation after properly accounting for their greater risk of death and loss-to-clinic.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSurvival RateTime FactorsAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral therapyCompeting risksHIVInjection drug useRestricted mean survival timeSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID29523081
PMCPMC5845164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.