Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29522530›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Impact of a Family Clinic Day intervention on paediatric and adolescent appointment adherence and retention in antiretroviral therapy: A cluster randomized controlled trial in Uganda.

Justin C Graves, Peter Elyanu, Christine J Schellack, Barbara Asire, Margaret L Prust, Marta R Prescott, Esther Mirembe, Ivan Lukabwe, Betty Mirembe, Joshua Musinguzi and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Justin C GravesApplied Analytics Team, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-9721
Peter ElyanuSTD/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Christine J SchellackClinton Health Access Initiative, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara AsireSTD/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Margaret L PrustApplied Analytics Team, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marta R PrescottApplied Analytics Team, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Esther MirembeClinton Health Access Initiative, Kampala, Uganda.
Ivan LukabweSTD/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Betty MirembeClinton Health Access Initiative, Kampala, Uganda.
Joshua MusinguziSTD/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah A MoberleyApplied Analytics Team, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, Uganda adopted a test-and-treat policy for HIV patients 15 years or younger. Low retention rates among paediatric and adolescent antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiates could severely limit the impact of this new policy. This evaluation tested the impact of a differentiated care model called Family Clinic Day (FCD), a family-centered appointment scheduling and health education intervention on patient retention and adherence to monthly appointment scheduling.

methodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, from October 2014 to March 2015. Forty-six facilities were stratified by implementing partner and facility type and randomly assigned to the control or intervention arm. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients retained in care at 6 months and the proportion adherent to their appointment schedule at last study period scheduled visit. Data collection occurred retrospectively in May 2015. Six patient focus group discussions and 17 health workers interviews were conducted to understand perspectives on FCD successes and challenges.

resultsA total of 4,715 paediatric and adolescent patient records were collected, of which 2,679 (n = 1,319 from 23 control facilities and 1,360 from 23 intervention facilities) were eligible for inclusion. The FCD did not improve retention (aOR 1.11; 90% CI 0.63-1.97, p = 0.75), but was associated with improved adherence to last appointment schedule (aOR 1.64; 90% CI 1.27-2.11, p<0.001). Qualitative findings suggested that FCD patients benefited from health education and increased psychosocial support.

conclusionFCD scale-up in Uganda may be an effective differentiated care model to ensure patient adherence to ART clinic appointment schedules, a key aspect necessary for viral load suppression. Patient health outcomes may also benefit following an increase in knowledge based on health education, and peer support. Broad challenges facing ART clinics, such as under-staffing and poor filing systems, should be addressed in order to improve patient care.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-HIV AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFamily HealthFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansInfantMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ComplianceUgandaAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29522530
PMCPMC5844531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.