Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29522524›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Uneven recombination rate and linkage disequilibrium across a reference SNP map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Matthew W Blair, Andrés J Cortés, Andrew D Farmer, Wei Huang, Daniel Ambachew, R Varma Penmetsa, Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia, Teshale Assefa, Steven B Cannon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genomic Prediction of Adaptation in Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of recombination frequency and distribution in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A Study of GUS Expression inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Annotation of the YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew W BlairDepartment of Agricultural & Environmental Science, Tennessee State University (TSU), Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-3726
Andrés J CortésColombian Corporation for Agricultural Research (CORPOICA), C.I. La Selva, Rionegro, Department of Antioquia, Colombia.
Andrew D FarmerNational Center for Genome Resources (NCGR), Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America.
Wei HuangIowa State University (ISU), Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Daniel AmbachewDepartment of Agricultural & Environmental Science, Tennessee State University (TSU), Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
R Varma PenmetsaUniversity of California, Davis (US-D), California, United States of America.
Noelia Carrasquilla-GarciaUniversity of California, Davis (US-D), California, United States of America.
Teshale AssefaIowa State University (ISU), Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Steven B CannonIowa State University (ISU), Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Agricultural Research Service · USTennessee State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USColombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA · COIowa State University · USNational Center for Genome Resources · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination (R) rate and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analyses are the basis for plant breeding. These vary by breeding system, by generation of inbreeding or outcrossing and by region in the chromosome. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a favored food legume with a small sequenced genome (514 Mb) and n = 11 chromosomes. The goal of this study was to describe R and LD in the common bean genome using a 768-marker array of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) based on Trans-legume Orthologous Group (TOG) genes along with an advanced-generation Recombinant Inbred Line reference mapping population (BAT93 x Jalo EEP558) and an internationally available diversity panel. A whole genome genetic map was created that covered all eleven linkage groups (LG). The LGs were linked to the physical map by sequence data of the TOGs compared to each chromosome sequence of common bean. The genetic map length in total was smaller than for previous maps reflecting the precision of allele calling and mapping with SNP technology as well as the use of gene-based markers. A total of 91.4% of TOG markers had singleton hits with annotated Pv genes and all mapped outside of regions of resistance gene clusters. LD levels were found to be stronger within the Mesoamerican genepool and decay more rapidly within the Andean genepool. The recombination rate across the genome was 2.13 cM / Mb but R was found to be highly repressed around centromeres and frequent outside peri-centromeric regions. These results have important implications for association and genetic mapping or crop improvement in common bean.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersLinkage DisequilibriumMultigene FamilyPhaseolusPlant BreedingDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID29522524
PMCPMC5844515
OpenAlexW2790951509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.