Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29522520›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Comparison of antigen and antibody responses in repeat lymphatic filariasis transmission assessment surveys in American Samoa.

Kimberly Y Won, Keri Robinson, Katy L Hamlin, Joseph Tufa, Margaret Seespesara, Ryan E Wiegand, Katherine Gass, Joseph Kubofcik, Thomas B Nutman, Patrick J Lammie and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Integrated serosurveillance of multiple communicable diseases in the hinterland of Guyana.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anti-filarial antibodies are sensitive indicators of lymphatic filariasis transmission and enable identification of high-risk populations and hotspots.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential use of antibodies to provide an earlier indication of lymphatic filariasis resurgence in post-mass drug ad ministration surveillance in American Samoa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kimberly Y WonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-6140
Keri RobinsonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Katy L HamlinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Joseph TufaDepartment of Health, Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
Margaret SeespesaraDepartment of Health, Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
Ryan E WiegandCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Katherine GassTask Force for Global Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases Support Center, Decatur, GA, United States of America.
Joseph KubofcikNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Thomas B NutmanNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Patrick J LammieCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Saipale FuimaonoDepartment of Health, Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program, Pago Pago, American Samoa.

Funding

Clinical And Therapeutic Studies Of Human Filariasis and Related DiseasesZIAAI000439 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI NUTMAN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$14.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent WHO recommendations for lymphatic filariasis (LF) surveillance advise programs to implement activities to monitor for new foci of transmission after stopping mass drug administration (MDA). A current need in the global effort to eliminate LF is to standardize diagnostic tools and surveillance activities beyond the recommended transmission assessment survey (TAS). METHODOLOGY: TAS was first conducted in American Samoa in 2011 (TAS 1) and a repeat TAS was carried out in 2015 (TAS 2). Circulating filarial antigen (CFA) and serologic results from both surveys were analyzed to determine whether interruption of LF transmission has been achieved in American Samoa. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 1,134 and 864 children (5-10 years old) were enrolled in TAS 1 and TAS 2, respectively. Two CFA-positive children were identified in TAS 1, and one CFA-positive child was identified in TAS 2. Results of both surveys were below the threshold for which MDA was warranted. Additionally, 1,112 and 836 dried blood spots from TAS 1 and TAS 2, respectively were tested for antibodies to Wb123, Bm14 and Bm33 by luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay and multiplex bead assay. In 2011, overall prevalence of responses to Wb123, Bm14, and Bm33 was 1.0%, 6.8% and 12.0%, respectively. In 2015, overall prevalence of positive Bm14 and Bm33 responses declined significantly to 3.0% (p<0.001) and 7.8% (p = 0.013), respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although passing TAS 1 and TAS 2 and an overall decline in the prevalence of antibodies to Bm14 and Bm33 between these surveys suggests decreased exposure and infection among young children, there were persistent responses in some schools. Clustering and persistence of positive antibody responses in schools may be an indication of ongoing transmission. There is a need to better understand the limitations of current antibody tests, but our results suggest that serologic tools can have a role in guiding programmatic decision making.

Indexed as

AlbendazoleAmerican SamoaAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthChildChild, PreschoolDried Blood Spot TestingElephantiasis, FilarialEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleFilaricidesHumansMalePrevalenceSerologic TestsAlbendazoleAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthFilaricides

Identifiers

PMID29522520
PMCPMC5862496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.