Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29522469›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Range Expansion of Tick Disease Vectors in North America: Implications for Spread of Tick-Borne Disease.

Daniel E Sonenshine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 276 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Mapping the Global Distribution ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Coinfection ecology and pathogen emergence in aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Bayesian Multivariate Modelling of Lone Star (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Lyme Disease Vaccine Paradox.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel E SonenshineLaboratory for Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. dsonensh@odu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are the major vectors of most disease-causing agents to humans, companion animals and wildlife. Moreover, ticks transmit a greater variety of pathogenic agents than any other blood-feeding arthropod. Ticks have been expanding their geographic ranges in recent decades largely due to climate change. Furthermore, tick populations in many areas of their past and even newly established localities have increased in abundance. These dynamic changes present new and increasing severe public health threats to humans, livestock and companion animals in areas where they were previously unknown or were considered to be of minor importance. Here in this review, the geographic status of four representative tick species are discussed in relation to these public health concerns, namely, the American dog tick,

Indexed as

Arachnid VectorsIxodidaeAnimalsAnimals, WildGeography, MedicalHumansNorth AmericaTick-Borne Diseasesabiotic factorsAmblyomma americanumAmblyomma maculatumbiotic factorsclimate changeDermacentor variabilishabitatshostsIxodes scapularis

Identifiers

PMID29522469
PMCPMC5877023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.