ArticleJournal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision2018
Wavefront measurement using computational adaptive optics.
Article in Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust wavefront correction using AdamW-enhanced SPGD for computational adaptive optics in optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Dynamic full-field swept-source optical coherence tomography for high-resolution, long-depth, and intratissue-activity imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Image formation theory of optical coherence tomography with optical aberrations and its application to computational aberration correction.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Wide Dynamic Range Digital Aberration Measurement and Fast Anterior-Segment OCT ImagingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Adaptive optics for optical microscopy [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Computational refocusing of Jones matrix polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography and investigation of defocus-induced polarization artifacts.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Digital ocular swept source optical coherence aberrometry.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Wavefront sensor-less adaptive optics using deep reinforcement learning.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Closed-loop wavefront sensing and correction in the mouse brain with computed optical coherence microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Automated fast computational adaptive optics for optical coherence tomography based on a stochastic parallel gradient descent algorithm.Optics express · 2020Article
- Computed optical coherence microscopy of mouse brain ex vivo.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Automated sensorless single-shot closed-loop adaptive optics microscopy with feedback from computational adaptive optics.Optics express · 2019Article
- Local wavefront mapping in tissue using computational adaptive optics OCT.Optics letters · 2019Article
- Analysis of Damage and Wound Healing in the Retinal Pigmented Epithelium.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Aberration-diverse optical coherence tomography for suppression of multiple scattering and speckle.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many optical imaging applications, it is necessary to correct for aberrations to obtain high quality images. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides access to the amplitude and phase of the backscattered optical field for three-dimensional (3D) imaging samples. Computational adaptive optics (CAO) modifies the phase of the OCT data in the spatial frequency domain to correct optical aberrations without using a deformable mirror, as is commonly done in hardware-based adaptive optics (AO). This provides improvement of image quality throughout the 3D volume, enabling imaging across greater depth ranges and in highly aberrated samples. However, the CAO aberration correction has a complicated relation to the imaging pupil and is not a direct measurement of the pupil aberrations. Here we present new methods for recovering the wavefront aberrations directly from the OCT data without the use of hardware adaptive optics. This enables both computational measurement and correction of optical aberrations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.