ArticleEye (London, England)2018
Cat-PROM5: a brief psychometrically robust self-report questionnaire instrument for cataract surgery.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC).Annals of medicine · 2022Trial
- Postoperative visual acuity: an appropriate measure of cataract surgical failure, but no longer for success?Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Association of Systemic and Ocular Comorbidities with Visual Recovery in Patients with Postoperative Corneal Oedema: A Real-World Study of Cataract Surgery Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation between postoperative visual recovery and subjective visual satisfaction in cataract patients with different corneal astigmatism degrees: a retrospective cohort study.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Falling short of the target: effective cataract surgical coverage and the road to 2030.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Catquest-9SF and Cat-PROM5 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- A thematic analysis of patients' experiences of receiving treatment for Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Factors influencing outcome satisfaction after cataract surgery: patient-reported insights from the RayPro database.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Observational
- Article
- Validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for giant cell arteritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Patient satisfaction after EDOF intraocular lens implantation in vitrectomized eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Impact of the value driven outcomes program among cataract surgery patients in Singapore: an interrupted time series analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pituitary adenoma undergoing transsphenoidal surgery.Pituitary · 2022Article
- Article
- Exploring Vision-Related Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study Comparing Patients' Experience of Cataract Surgery with a Standard Monofocal IOL and an Enhanced Monofocal IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Methods for evaluating quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Review
- Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires.Eye (London, England) · 2018Article
- Mapping to Quality of Life and Capability Measures in Cataract Surgery Patients: From Cat-PROM5 to EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-O Using Mixture Modelling.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeTo develop a short, psychometrically robust and responsive cataract patient reported outcome measure suitable for use in high-volume surgical environments.MethodsA prospective study in which participants completed development versions of questionnaires exploring the quality of their eyesight using items harvested from two existing United Kingdom developed parent questionnaires. Participants were 822 patients awaiting cataract surgery recruited from 4 cataract surgical centres based in the UK. Exclusion criteria were other visually significant comorbidities and age <50 years. An iterative multi-stage process of evaluation using Rasch and factor analyses with sequential item reduction was undertaken.ResultsA definitive item set of just five items delivered performance in accordance with the requirements of the Rasch model: no threshold disordering, no misfitting items, Rasch-based reliability 0.90, person separation 2.98, Cronbach's α 0.89, good targeting of questions to patients with cataract with pre-operative item mean -0.41 logits and absence of significant floor or ceiling effects, minor deviations of item invariance, and confirmed unidimensionality. The test-re-test repeatability intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.89 with excellent responsiveness to surgery, Cohen's d -1.45 SD. Rasch calibration values are provided for Cat-PROM5 users.ConclusionsA psychometrically robust and highly responsive five-item cataract surgery patient reported outcome measure has been developed, which is suitable for use in high-volume cataract surgical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.