SynthesisJournal of periodontology2018
A network meta-analysis of interproximal oral hygiene methods in the reduction of clinical indices of inflammation.
Synthesis in Journal of periodontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06515483 (Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Loop Stretchable Dental Floss in Controlling Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque Removal During Thirty Days), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Loop Stretchable Dental Floss in Controlling Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque Removal During Thirty Days
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health action process approach in oral health behaviour: Target interventions, constructs and groups-A systematic review.International journal of dental hygiene · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of power-driven interdental cleaning tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of interdental cleaning devices with active substances: a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy of a rubber bristles interdental cleaner on parameters of oral soft tissue health-a systematic review.International journal of dental hygiene · 2022Pooled it
- Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental caries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The effect of dental floss sequence on plaque removal efficacy and periodontal health: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Interdental Brushing and Obstetrical Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnant Women: Insights From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of AirFloss Ultra With Essential Oils Versus Waxed Dental Floss as Adjunct to Toothbrushing: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Effects of daily home-use water flossing as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy in the treatment of stage I-II periodontitis: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the effects of using an interdental brush dipped in 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel on clinical periodontal parameters among patients with periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of a water flosser compared to an interdental brush on gingival bleeding and gingival abrasion: A 4 week randomized controlled trial.International journal of dental hygiene · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of dental floss in the management of gingival health: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- Self-determined use of provided powered oral hygiene devices leads to improved gingival health after 1 year: a longitudinal clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Effects of water flossing on gingival inflammation and supragingival plaque microbiota: a 12-week randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Efficacy of dental floss in the management of gingival health: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Clinical and biochemical evaluation of oral irrigation in patients with peri-implant mucositis: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Effects of an oral hygiene regimen on progression of gingivitis/early periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2021Trial
- The influence of implant platform apico-coronal position on the bone level of adjacent teeth.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- The Patient-Centred Interdental Cleaning Concept-Consensus Based on a Round Table.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA wide selection of Interdental Oral Hygiene (IOH) aids is available to consumers. Recommendations for selection are, however, limited by the lack of direct comparisons in available studies. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of IOH aids using Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis (BNMA).
methodsTwo independent reviewers performed a systematic literature review of randomized clinical trials assessing IOH aids, based on a focused question. Gingival inflammation (Gingival Index (GI), Bleeding-on-probing (BOP)) was the primary outcome and plaque and probing depth were secondary outcomes A random-effects arm-based BNMA model was run for each outcome; posterior medians and 95% credible-intervals (CIs) summarized marginal distributions of parameters.
resultsA two-phase selection process identified 22 trials assessing 10 IOH aids as brushing adjuncts. Interdental brushes (IB) yielded the largest reduction in GI (0.23 [95% CI: 0.09, 0.37]) as toothbrushing adjuncts, followed by water-jet (WJ) (0.19 [95% CI: 0.14, 0.24]). Rankings based on posterior probabilities revealed that IB and WJ had the highest probability of being "best" (64.7% and 27.4%, respectively) for GI reduction, whereas the probability for toothpick and floss being the "best" IOH aids was near zero. Notably, except for toothpicks, all IOH aids were better at reducing GI as compared with control.
conclusionsBNMA enabled us to quantitatively evaluate IOH aids and provide a global ranking of their efficacy. Interdental brushes and water-jets ranked high for reducing gingival bleeding, whereas toothpicks and floss ranked last. The patient-perceived benefit of IOH aids is not clear because gingival inflammation measures are physical indicators of periodontal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.