Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520859›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2019

Contrast gain control and retinogeniculate communication.

Henry J Alitto, Daniel L Rathbun, Tucker G Fisher, Prescott C Alexander, W Martin Usrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Differential Impact of Retinal Lesions on Visual Responses of LGN X and Y Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Chilean brush-tailed mouse (Journal of neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Augmentation of Retinogeniculate Communication during Thalamic Burst Mode.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry J AlittoCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Daniel L RathbunCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Tucker G FisherCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Prescott C AlexanderCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
W Martin UsreyCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4582-4180
University of California, Davis · USHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEStanford University · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Functional Properties of Neural Circuits for VisionR01EY013588 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI USREY, W MARTIN · 2001 to 2022
$7.8M
Vision Science Training Program: Cornea to CortexT32EY015387 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 2003 to 2026
$4.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013588NEI NIH HHS T32 EY015387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual information processed in the retina is transmitted to primary visual cortex via relay cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the dorsal thalamus. Although retinal ganglion cells are the primary source of driving input to LGN neurons, not all retinal spikes are transmitted to the cortex. Here, we investigate the relationship between stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate communication and test the hypothesis that both the time course and strength of retinogeniculate interactions are dynamic and dependent on stimulus contrast. By simultaneously recording the spiking activity of synaptically connected retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurons in the cat, we show that the temporal window for retinogeniculate integration and the effectiveness of individual retinal spikes are inversely proportional to stimulus contrast. This finding provides a mechanistic understanding for the phenomenon of augmented contrast gain control in the LGN-a nonlinear receptive field property of LGN neurons whereby response gain during low-contrast stimulation is enhanced relative to response gain during high-contrast stimulation. In addition, these results support the view that network interactions beyond the retina play an essential role in transforming visual signals en route from retina to cortex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCatsContrast SensitivityGeniculate BodiesRetinal Ganglion CellsVision, OcularVisual Pathwayscatlateral geniculate nucleusretinathalamusvision

Identifiers

PMID29520859
PMCPMC6129230
OpenAlexW2792571414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.