Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520735›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Neonatal outcomes among twins stratified by method of conception: secondary analysis of maternal fetal medicine (MFMU) network database.

Jaimin S Shah, Susan Hosseini Nasab, Neil Chappell, Han-Yang Chen, Amy Schutt, Hector Mendez-Figueroa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialTwin Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaimin S ShahDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Suite 3.214, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Jaimin.Shah@uth.tmc.edu.
Susan Hosseini NasabDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Suite 3.214, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Neil ChappellDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Han-Yang ChenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Suite 3.214, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Amy SchuttDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Hector Mendez-FigueroaDepartment of Maternal & Fetal Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether twin pregnancies conceived by different forms of fertility treatments are associated with adverse neonatal outcomes and to examine the difference in maternal and obstetrical characteristics between patients.

methodsOur study was a retrospective analysis of twin pregnancies conceived by fertility treatments from a prospectively collected database. Treatments were stratified into two groups: group 1 (ART) consisted of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and group 2 (non-ART) included intrauterine insemination (IUI) and ovulation induction (OI). Composite neonatal morbidity included respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, leukomalacia, chronic lung disease, and death prior to discharge.

resultsThere were 460 neonates in our study; among them, 67% (n = 310) were in group 1, and 33% (n = 150) in group 2. Group 1 patients were more likely to be older (p = 0.004), nulliparous (p = 0.01), delivered twins with lower birth weights (2278 g ± 605 vs. 2427 ± 519, p = 0.009), and had more deliveries < 32 weeks gestation (p = 0.001). In multivariable Poisson regression model, only neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was increased for group 1 twins (aRR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.003-1.60).

conclusionsAfter adjusting for confounders, twins conceived via ART compared to non-ART had similar neonatal outcomes. These data can help when counseling this patient population and assist in planning larger prospective cohorts.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualFertilizationPregnancy OutcomeAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPregnancy, TwinProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicYoung AdultAssisted reproductive technologyComposite neonatal morbidityMethod of conceptionNeonatalTwin gestation

Identifiers

PMID29520735
PMCPMC6030005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.