Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520731›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.

Femke M de Man, Andrew K L Goey, Ron H N van Schaik, Ron H J Mathijssen, Sander Bins

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 198 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Femke M de ManDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew K L GoeyDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H N van SchaikDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander BinsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.bins@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today's literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotidePrecision MedicineArea Under CurveCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADrug InteractionsGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansInactivation, MetabolicIrinotecanTissue DistributionTopoisomerase I InhibitorsUGT1A1 EnzymeCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanTopoisomerase I InhibitorsUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID29520731
PMCPMC6132501
OpenAlexW2790768119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.