Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520709›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

Direct Analysis of Proteins from Solutions with High Salt Concentration Using Laser Electrospray Mass Spectrometry.

Santosh Karki, Fengjian Shi, Jieutonne J Archer, Habiballah Sistani, Robert J Levis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. MSJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  6. C(P)XCG Proteins ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinically Viable Assay for Monitoring Uromodulin Glycosylation.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santosh KarkiDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Photonics Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Fengjian ShiDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Photonics Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Jieutonne J ArcherDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Photonics Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Habiballah SistaniDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Photonics Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Robert J LevisDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Advanced Photonics Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. rjlevis@temple.edu.
Temple University · USPhotonics (United States) · US

Funding

National Science Foundation (CHE-1362890, CHE-0957694)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of lysozyme, or a mixture of lysozyme, cytochrome c, and myoglobin, from solutions with varying salt concentrations (0.1 to 250 mM NaCl) is compared using laser electrospray mass spectrometry (LEMS) and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Protonated protein peaks were observed up to a concentration of 250 mM NaCl in the case of LEMS. In the case of ESI-MS, a protein solution with salt concentration > 0.5 mM resulted in predominantly salt-adducted features, with suppression of the protonated protein ions. The constituents in the mixture of proteins were assignable up to 250 mM NaCl for LEMS and were not assignable above a NaCl concentration of 0.5 mM for ESI. The average sodium adducts (< n >) bound to the 7+ charge state of lysozyme for LEMS measurements from salt concentrations of 2.5, 25, 50, and 100 mM NaCl are 1.71, 5.23, 5.26, and 5.11, respectively. The conventional electrospray measurements for lysozyme solution containing salt concentrations of 0.1, 1, 2, and 5 mM NaCl resulted in < n > of 2.65, 6.44, 7.57, and 8.48, respectively. LEMS displays an approximately two orders of magnitude higher salt tolerance in comparison with conventional ESI-MS. The non-equilibrium partitioning of proteins on the surface of the charged droplets is proposed as the mechanism for the high salt tolerance phenomena observed in the LEMS measurements. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytochromes cLasersMuramidaseMyoglobinProteinsSodium ChlorideSolutionsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationCytochromes cMuramidaseMyoglobinProteinsSodium ChlorideSolutionsCharge state distributionDirect protein analysisFemtosecondHigh salt concentrationLaser ablation

Identifiers

PMID29520709
OpenAlexW2789236384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.