ReviewDrug safety2018
EudraVigilance Medicines Safety Database: Publicly Accessible Data for Research and Public Health Protection.
Review in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review of disproportionality analysis studies.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Masking effect in the Spanish spontaneous reporting database FEDRA.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patterns and Predictors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Reporting patterns of adverse drug withdrawal events using individual case safety reports in the FAERS and Eudravigilance databases.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Digoxin Dosing Errors, Drug Interactions and Off-Label Risks: Insights from an EudraVigilance Disproportionality Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolic and Inflammatory Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Amlodipine: A Descriptive and Disproportionality Analysis of EudraVigilance Reports.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risks Associated with 5α-Reductase Inhibitor Use: Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions Reported to EudraVigilance.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- VigiBase: Resource Profile Update with a Summary of Global Patterns and Trends in Adverse Event Reports for Medicines and Vaccines.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Secondary malignancy of T-cell origin after CAR T-cell therapy: EMA's conclusions from the evaluation of 38 suspected cases.Gene therapy · 2026Article
- Resistance, Ineffectiveness, and Off-Label Use Related to Cephalosporins from the Reserve Group-A Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection Study on EudraVigilance Database.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Updated Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Study of Drug- Induced Breast Cancer Based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Data.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Post-marketing safety profile of dengue vaccines CYD-TDV and TAK-003: analysis of adverse event reports from a European database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- "Trends and challenges in adverse drug reaction reporting in Spain: Analysis of the FEDRA database (2019-2023)".European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Transforming Pharmacovigilance With Pharmacogenomics: Toward Personalized Risk Management.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- An assessment of anti-VEGF drugs safety based on real-world data: from popularity to spontaneous reporting in eudravigilance database.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Article
- FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Essentials: A Guide to Understanding, Applying, and Interpreting Adverse Event Data Reported to FAERS.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- EudraVigilance insights: Suspected adverse drug reactions in infants through breastfeeding.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Observational
- Global estimates of vaccine-associated narcolepsy from 1967 to 2023.Scientific reports · 2025Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of safety data from spontaneous reporting systems has a proven value for the detection and analysis of the risks of medicines following their placement on the market and use in medical practice. EudraVigilance is the pharmacovigilance database to manage the collection and analysis of suspected adverse reactions to medicines authorised in the European Economic Area. EudraVigilance first operated in December 2001, with access to the database being governed by the EudraVigilance access policy. We performed a literature search including data up to December 2016 to demonstrate how the data from EudraVigilance has been used in scientific publications. We describe the results, including by type of publication, research topics and drugs involved. In 50% of the publications, the data are used to describe safety issues, in 44% to analyse methodologies used in pharmacovigilance activities and in 6% to support clinical perspectives. We also outline a description of the use of the database by the European Union regulatory network. Driven by the full implementation of the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation, EudraVigilance has undergone further enhancements together with a major revision of its access policy, taking into account the use of the new individual case safety report standard developed by the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and the International Organization for Standardization. The aim of the broadened access is to facilitate more effective safety monitoring of authorised medicines, to make more data available for research and to provide better access to information on suspected adverse reactions for healthcare professionals and patients. In November 2017, the new full functionalities of EudraVigilance were launched, including the extensive web access to data on suspected adverse drug reactions and the possibilities for academic research institutions to request a more extensive dataset for the purposes of health research. The main objective of this article is to describe the new access to the database together with the opportunities that this new access can bring for research. It is intended to promote an appropriate use of the data to support the safe and effective use of medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.