Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520645›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2018

EudraVigilance Medicines Safety Database: Publicly Accessible Data for Research and Public Health Protection.

Rodrigo Postigo, Sabine Brosch, Jim Slattery, Anja van Haren, Jean-Michel Dogné, Xavier Kurz, Gianmario Candore, Francois Domergue, Peter Arlett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Masking effect in the Spanish spontaneous reporting database FEDRA.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An assessment of anti-VEGF drugs safety based on real-world data: from popularity to spontaneous reporting in eudravigilance database.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rodrigo PostigoEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK. rodrigo.postigo@ema.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7441-9424
Sabine BroschEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Jim SlatteryEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Anja van HarenMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jean-Michel DognéAgence Fédérale des Médicaments et des Produits de Santé (Member of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee), Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier KurzEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Gianmario CandoreEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Francois DomergueEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Peter ArlettEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of safety data from spontaneous reporting systems has a proven value for the detection and analysis of the risks of medicines following their placement on the market and use in medical practice. EudraVigilance is the pharmacovigilance database to manage the collection and analysis of suspected adverse reactions to medicines authorised in the European Economic Area. EudraVigilance first operated in December 2001, with access to the database being governed by the EudraVigilance access policy. We performed a literature search including data up to December 2016 to demonstrate how the data from EudraVigilance has been used in scientific publications. We describe the results, including by type of publication, research topics and drugs involved. In 50% of the publications, the data are used to describe safety issues, in 44% to analyse methodologies used in pharmacovigilance activities and in 6% to support clinical perspectives. We also outline a description of the use of the database by the European Union regulatory network. Driven by the full implementation of the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation, EudraVigilance has undergone further enhancements together with a major revision of its access policy, taking into account the use of the new individual case safety report standard developed by the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and the International Organization for Standardization. The aim of the broadened access is to facilitate more effective safety monitoring of authorised medicines, to make more data available for research and to provide better access to information on suspected adverse reactions for healthcare professionals and patients. In November 2017, the new full functionalities of EudraVigilance were launched, including the extensive web access to data on suspected adverse drug reactions and the possibilities for academic research institutions to request a more extensive dataset for the purposes of health research. The main objective of this article is to describe the new access to the database together with the opportunities that this new access can bring for research. It is intended to promote an appropriate use of the data to support the safe and effective use of medicines.

Indexed as

European UnionPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualHumans

Identifiers

PMID29520645
PMCPMC5990579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.