Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520636›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2018

The Future of Personality Theory: a Processual Approach.

Svetlana N Kostromina, Natalia V Grishina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Personality Type on the Occurrence of Temporomandibular Disorders-A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Personality Process-Structure Duality: Reply to Two Commentaries.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Svetlana N KostrominaDepartment of Personality Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. s.kostromina@spbu.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-9508-2587
Natalia V GrishinaDepartment of Personality Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perpetual discussion of approaches and principles in the study of personality has been one of the notable trends of development of psychological science over many decades. The structural approach, based on the delineation of a person's traits and characteristics, made an important contribution to various branches of psychology, but now the scientific community has recognized the limitations of a structural understanding of personality. Its inadequacy becomes particularly obvious in today's conditions, when fundamental changes pose a challenge to man's ability to respond flexibly to changing conditions of everyday existence, as well as to larger-scale changes. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is obvious that there is a need for new ways to understand and describe the personality: Scholars are calling for study of the dynamic personality, of the personality as an open system. At the foundational level, modern personality psychology should incorporate classical ideas about its structure; secondly, it should consider personality in the context of the individual's lifetime; and - at the highest level - it should describe personality as the subject of Being. We submit our own description of personality psychology's problem field.

Indexed as

PersonalityPsychological TheoryPsychologyHumansEveryday life psychologyExistential approachPersonality psychologyProblem field of personality psychologyProcessual approachSituational and contextual levelStructural approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.