Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520537›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2018

Radiological glenohumeral osteoarthritis in long-term type 1 diabetes. Prevalence and reliability of three classification systems. The Dialong shoulder study.

Niels Gunnar Juel, Jens I Brox, Johan C Hellund, Else Merckoll, Kristine B Holte, Tore J Berg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niels Gunnar JuelDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. n_gj@hotmail.com.
Jens I BroxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0407, Oslo, Norway.
Johan C HellundClinic of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Else MerckollClinic of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine B HolteDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tore J BergDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Sophies Minde Ortopedi AS 19/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the present study, we evaluate the intra- and interrater agreement of radiological glenohumeral OA using three different classification systems and estimate the prevalence of radiological and clinical glenohumeral OA in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), for over 45 years and controls (The Dialong study). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 102 patients with DM1 (49% women, mean age, 61.9 years) and 73 controls (57% women, mean age, 62.6 years). Anterior-posterior shoulder radiographs were interpreted by two observers applying the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L), Samilson-Prieto (S-P) and Samilson-Prieto Allain (S-PA) classifications.

resultsThe interrater agreement was moderate (weighted kappa, 0.46 to 0.48) for all classifications and the intrarater agreement mainly substantial (0.48-0.86) for both observers. The agreed prevalence of radiological OA was 26 and 18% (OR 1.6 (0.8 to 3.3), p = 0.22, 44 and 26% (OR 2.2 (1.2 to 4.2), p = 0.02) and 30 and 17% (OR 2.1 (1.0 to 4.5), p = 0.05) for the K-L, S-P and S-PA classifications respectively in the diabetes and control groups. The prevalence of moderate or severe radiological OA was 1 to 6% and clinical OA 1 to 2% with no difference between the groups.

conclusionThe prevalence of radiological glenohumeral OA was higher in the diabetes group with the Samilson-Prieto classification systems, but not associated with clinical OA. The interrater agreement was moderate. We recommend the Samilson-Prieto Allain classification for glenohumeral OA to avoid interpretation of osteophytes < 1 mm as OA in patient groups with a low pre-test likelihood of glenohumeral OA.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayObserver VariationOsteoarthritisPrevalenceRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsShoulder JointFrozen shoulderGlenohumeral osteoarthrosisHbA1cKellgren–Lawrence classificationSamilson–Prieto classificationShoulderType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29520537
OpenAlexW2793891241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.