ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018
Motion-invariant SRT treatment detection from direct M-scan OCT imaging.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical dosimeter for selective retinal therapy based on multi-port fiber-optic interferometry.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Selective retina therapy monitoring by speckle variance optical coherence tomography for dosimetry control.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSelective retina therapy (SRT) is a laser treatment targeting specific posterior retinal layers. It is focused on inducing damage to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), while sparing other retinal tissue compared to traditional photocoagulation. However, the targeted RPE layer is invisible with most imaging modalities and induced SRT lesions cannot be monitored. In this work, imaging scans acquired from an experimental setup that couples the SRT laser beam with an optical coherence tomography (OCT) beam are analyzed in order to evaluate the treatment as they occur.
methodsWe isolated a small part of the time-resolved scan corresponding to the end of the treatment, for which we have microscopic evidence of the SRT outcome. We then use a convolutional neural network to correspond each scan to the treatment result. We explore which aspects of the scan convey more valuable information for a robust therapy evaluation. By only using this adequately small part, we can achieve an online estimation, while being resilient to eye movement.
resultsThe available dataset consists of time- resolved OCT scans of 98 ex vivo porcine eyes, treated with different energy levels. The proposed method yields high performance in the task of predicting whether the applied energy was adequate for SRT treatment, by focusing on the immediate OCT signal acquired during treatment time.
conclusionsWe propose a strategy toward online noninvasive SRT treatment assessment, able to provide a satisfying evaluation of a treatment status, that therefore could be used for the planning of the treatment continuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29520526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.