Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520512›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2018

Comparative Analysis of the Gut Bacterial Community of Four Anastrepha Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Based on Pyrosequencing.

Carmen Ventura, Carlos I Briones-Roblero, Emilio Hernández, Flor N Rivera-Orduña, Gerardo Zúñiga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. We and herbivores eat endophytes.Microbial biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Metagenomic Survey of the Highly PolyphagousFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen VenturaPosgrado en Ciencias Quimicobiológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos I Briones-RobleroDepartamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico.
Emilio HernándezPrograma Moscamed-Moscafrut DGSV-SENASICA-SAGARPA, Subdirección de Desarrollo de Métodos, Camino a los Cacaotales s/n, Metapa de Domínguez, 30860, Chiapas, Mexico.
Flor N Rivera-OrduñaDepartamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gerardo ZúñigaDepartamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico. capotezu@hotmail.com.
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXSecretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food · MX

Funding

Instituto Politécnico Nacional Programa Institucional de Formación de Investigadores SIP 20141308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit flies are the most economically important group of phytophagous flies worldwide. Whereas the ecological role of bacteria associated with tephritid fruit fly species of the genera Bactrocera and Ceratitis has been demonstrated, the diversity of the bacterial community in Anastrepha has been poorly characterized. This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of the bacterial community in the gut of larvae and adults of Anastrepha ludens, A. obliqua, A. serpentina, and A. striata using 454 pyrosequencing. A total of four phyla, seven classes, 11 families, and 27 bacterial genera were identified. Proteobacteria was the most represented phylum, followed by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Deinococcus-Thermus. The genera Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Klebsiella, and Raoultella were dominant in all samples analyzed. In general, the bacterial community diversity in adult flies was higher in species with a broader diet breadth than species with a restricted number of hosts, whereas it was also higher in adults versus larvae. Differences in bacterial communities in adults might be determined by the number of fruit species infested. Lastly, the predictive functional profile analysis suggested that community members may participate in metabolic pathways related to membrane transport and metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids, cofactors, and lipids. These results provide the basis for the study of unexplored functional roles of bacteria in this insect group.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeActinobacteriaAnimalsBacillotaBacterial Typing TechniquesBase SequenceDeinococcusDNA, BacterialLarvaProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAStomachSymbiosisTephritidaeDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29520512
OpenAlexW2790094542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.