Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520471›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2018

First-trial protective step performance before and after short-term perturbation practice in people with Parkinson's disease.

J S Barajas, D S Peterson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S BarajasCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 425 N 5th St, Phoenix, AZ, 84005, USA.
D S PetersonCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 425 N 5th St, Phoenix, AZ, 84005, USA. daniel.peterson1@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Medical Research Foundation of Oregon Early Investigator AwardU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs I01BX007080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtective steps are critical for fall prevention and are altered in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous work suggests that perturbation training, in which patients are exposed to repeated slips, may improve protective postural responses. However, these studies typically take the average performance of several postural responses before and after training. To reduce falls in the community, training must improve protective stepping after the first perturbation exposure. To date, no investigations have examined whether first-trial protective stepping is improved after training in people with PD.

methodsFirst-trial protective stepping was measured in 14 people with PD and 9 healthy adults before and 24 h after 1 day of perturbation training. The primary outcome was margin of stability after a perturbation, a measure of protective stepping effectiveness.

resultsMargin of stability for the first perturbation was significantly (p = 0.001) improved on day 2 compared to before perturbation practice (day 1) in both groups. Furthermore, improvement in margin of stability was correlated with age and baseline stepping performance, such that older individuals and people with worse baseline performance showed the most pronounced improvement.

conclusionsImproving the first loss of balance after training is critical if such training is to reduce falls in people with PD. The observed improvement in first-trial protective stepping provides further support for perturbation training as a potential tool to improve protective steps and reduce falls in people with PD.

Indexed as

WalkingAccidental FallsAgedAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAntiparkinson AgentsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseasePostural BalanceTreatment OutcomeAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopaFallsFirst trialsParkinson’s diseasePerturbation trainingReactive stepping

Identifiers

PMID29520471
OpenAlexW2789774183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.