Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520204›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2018

Laparoscopic Parenchyma-sparing Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.

Davit L Aghayan, Egidijus Pelanis, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Airazat M Kazaryan, Mushegh A Sahakyan, Bård I Røsok, Leonid Barkhatov, Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, Ole Jakob Elle, Bjørn Edwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasound Based Planning and Navigation for Non-Anatomical Liver Resections - AnIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Davit L AghayanThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Egidijus PelanisThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Åsmund Avdem FretlandThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Airazat M KazaryanThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Mushegh A SahakyanThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Bård I RøsokDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Rikshospitalet, Norway.
Leonid BarkhatovThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn Atle BjørnbethDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Rikshospitalet, Norway.
Ole Jakob ElleThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn EdwinThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is increasingly performed in specialized centers. While there is a trend towards a parenchyma-sparing strategy in multimodal treatment for CLM, its role is yet unclear. In this study we present short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection (LPSLR) at a single center. PATIENTS AND

methodsLLR were performed in 951 procedures between August 1998 and March 2017 at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Patients who primarily underwent LPSLR for CLM were included in the study. LPSLR was defined as non-anatomic hence the patients who underwent hemihepatectomy and sectionectomy were excluded. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. The Accordion classification was used to grade postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 40 months.

results296 patients underwent primary LPSLR for CLM. A single specimen was resected in 204 cases, multiple resections were performed in 92 cases. 5 laparoscopic operations were converted to open. The median operative time was 134 minutes, blood loss was 200 ml and hospital stay was 3 days. There was no 90-day mortality in this study. The postoperative complication rate was 14.5%. 189 patients developed disease recurrence. Recurrence in the liver occurred in 146 patients (49%), of whom 85 patients underwent repeated surgical treatment (liver resection [n = 69], ablation [n = 14] and liver transplantation [n = 2]). Five-year overall survival was 48%, median overall survival was 56 months.

conclusionsLPSLR of CLM can be performed safely with the good surgical and oncological results. The technique facilitates repeated surgical treatment, which may improve survival for patients with CLM.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerlaparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resectionliver metastasessurvival

Identifiers

PMID29520204
PMCPMC5839080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.