ArticleRadiology and oncology2018
Laparoscopic Parenchyma-sparing Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.
Article in Radiology and oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Resection and Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Within a Parenchyma-Sparing Strategy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resections for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis in the Ukrainian State Center.Cureus · 2023Article
- Review
- Parenchyma-Sparing Liver Resection or Regenerative Liver Surgery: Which Way to Go?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery: 20-year experience of a Norwegian high-volume referral center.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing redo liver resections for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a European multi-center study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Evaluation of clinical applicability of automated liver parenchyma segmentation of multi-center magnetic resonance images.European journal of radiology open · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Ultrasound Based Planning and Navigation for Non-Anatomical Liver Resections - AnIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic liver resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine metastases: perioperative and oncologic outcomes.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Liver segment imaging using monocyte sequestration: a potential tool for fluorescence-guided liver surgery.Theranostics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is increasingly performed in specialized centers. While there is a trend towards a parenchyma-sparing strategy in multimodal treatment for CLM, its role is yet unclear. In this study we present short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection (LPSLR) at a single center. PATIENTS AND
methodsLLR were performed in 951 procedures between August 1998 and March 2017 at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Patients who primarily underwent LPSLR for CLM were included in the study. LPSLR was defined as non-anatomic hence the patients who underwent hemihepatectomy and sectionectomy were excluded. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. The Accordion classification was used to grade postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 40 months.
results296 patients underwent primary LPSLR for CLM. A single specimen was resected in 204 cases, multiple resections were performed in 92 cases. 5 laparoscopic operations were converted to open. The median operative time was 134 minutes, blood loss was 200 ml and hospital stay was 3 days. There was no 90-day mortality in this study. The postoperative complication rate was 14.5%. 189 patients developed disease recurrence. Recurrence in the liver occurred in 146 patients (49%), of whom 85 patients underwent repeated surgical treatment (liver resection [n = 69], ablation [n = 14] and liver transplantation [n = 2]). Five-year overall survival was 48%, median overall survival was 56 months.
conclusionsLPSLR of CLM can be performed safely with the good surgical and oncological results. The technique facilitates repeated surgical treatment, which may improve survival for patients with CLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.