Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520097›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

An accurate and robust imputation method scImpute for single-cell RNA-seq data.

Wei Vivian Li, Jingyi Jessica Li

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 374 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
374citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

374 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. scCADI: Cell-Aware Diffusion Model for Single-Cell RNA-seq Imputation.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single-Cell Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

314 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei Vivian LiDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-2709
Jingyi Jessica LiDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA. jli@stat.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9288-5648

Funding

Robust Identification and accurate quantification of RNA transcripts on a system wide scaleR01GM120507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, JINGYI JESSICA · 2016 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies enable the investigation of transcriptomic landscapes at the single-cell resolution. ScRNA-seq data analysis is complicated by excess zero counts, the so-called dropouts due to low amounts of mRNA sequenced within individual cells. We introduce scImpute, a statistical method to accurately and robustly impute the dropouts in scRNA-seq data. scImpute automatically identifies likely dropouts, and only perform imputation on these values without introducing new biases to the rest data. scImpute also detects outlier cells and excludes them from imputation. Evaluation based on both simulated and real human and mouse scRNA-seq data suggests that scImpute is an effective tool to recover transcriptome dynamics masked by dropouts. scImpute is shown to identify likely dropouts, enhance the clustering of cell subpopulations, improve the accuracy of differential expression analysis, and aid the study of gene expression dynamics.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAlgorithmsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumansRNASequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID29520097
PMCPMC5843666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.