Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520090›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2018

Non-angiogenic tumours and their influence on cancer biology.

Tom Donnem, Andrew R Reynolds, Elizabeth A Kuczynski, Kevin Gatter, Peter B Vermeulen, Robert S Kerbel, Adrian L Harris, Francesco Pezzella

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vascular Disruption Therapy as a New Strategy for Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Embryonic reprogramming of the tumor vasculature reveals targets for cancer therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Tom DonnemDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Andrew R ReynoldsTumour Biology Team, Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Elizabeth A KuczynskiBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Kevin GatterNuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Peter B VermeulenTumour Biology Team, Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Robert S KerbelBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Adrian L HarrisMolecular Oncology Laboratories, Oxford University Department of Oncology, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Francesco PezzellaNuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEInstitute of Cancer Research · GBSunnybrook Research InstituteUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid tumours need a blood supply, and a large body of evidence has previously suggested that they can grow only if they induce the development of new blood vessels, a process known as tumour angiogenesis. On the basis of this hypothesis, it was proposed that anti-angiogenic drugs should be able to suppress the growth of all solid tumours. However, clinical experience with anti-angiogenic agents has shown that this is not always the case. Reports of tumours growing without the formation of new vessels can be found in the literature dating back to the 1800s, yet no formal recognition, description and demonstration of their special biological status was made until recently. In 1996, we formally recognized and described non-angiogenic tumours in lungs where the only blood vessels present were those originating from normal lung tissue. This is far from an isolated scenario, as non-angiogenic tumour growth has now been observed in tumours of many different organs in both humans and preclinical animal models. In this Opinion article, we summarize how these tumours were discovered and discuss what we know so far about their biology and the potential implications of this knowledge for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsBlood VesselsCell MovementHumansNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29520090
OpenAlexW2793944495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.