Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29520081›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2018

Evaluation of a clinical pharmacogenetics model to predict methotrexate response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rosario López-Rodríguez, Aida Ferreiro-Iglesias, Aurea Lima, Miguel Bernardes, Andrzej Pawlik, Agnieszka Paradowska-Gorycka, Jerzy Świerkot, Ryszard Slezak, Isidoro Gonzalez-Alvaro, Javier Narvaez and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacogenetics of Drug Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rosario López-RodríguezExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Aida Ferreiro-IglesiasExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Aurea LimaCESPU, Institute of Research & Advanced Training in Health Sciences & Technologies, Drug Discovery, Delivery & Toxicology Group, Gandra PRD, Portugal.
Miguel BernardesFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andrzej PawlikDepartment of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Paradowska-GoryckaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy ŚwierkotDepartment of Rheumatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Ryszard SlezakDepartment of Genetics, Medical University of Wroclaw, Wrocław, Poland.
Isidoro Gonzalez-AlvaroRheumatology Department, Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.
Javier NarvaezDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Pérez-PampínExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Antonio Mera-VarelaExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laura Vidal-BraloExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José Gorgonio Acuña-OchoaExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen CondeExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Antonio GonzalezExperimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. agmartinezp@ser.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-0606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variability of response to treatment hinders successful management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Consequently, a clinical pharmacogenetics model for predicting response to methotrexate (CP-MTX) has been previously proposed that includes four clinical variables (disease activity, sex, the presence of rheumatoid factor and smoking status) and four SNPs (rs2236225, rs17602729, rs1127354, and rs2372536) in genes of the folate pathway. It showed good performance, but failed to attract attention, likely, in relation with lack of clear clinical benefit. Here, we have revised the value of the CP-MTX model directly addressing its clinical benefit by focusing on the expected benefit-cost of the predictions. In addition, our study included a much larger number of RA patients (n = 720) in MTX monotherapy than previous studies. Benefit of CP-MTX prediction was defined as the patients that would have received combination therapy as first treatment because they were correctly predicted as non-responders to MTX monotherapy. In contrast, cost of CP-MTX prediction was defined as the responder patients that were wrongly predicted as non-responders. Application of CP-MTX predictions to our patients showed a good benefit-cost relationship, with half of the 66.7% non-responders to MTX monotherapy rightly directed to alternative treatments (a benefit of 33.3%) at the cost of 8.5% wrongly predicted non-responders. These benefits-costs were consistent with reanalysis of the previously published studies. Therefore, predictions of CP-MTX showed a good benefit-cost relationship for informing MTX prescription.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisPharmacogeneticsAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.