Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29519774›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Patient Centeredness in Electronic Communication: Evaluation of Patient-to-Health Care Team Secure Messaging.

Timothy P Hogan, Tana M Luger, Julie E Volkman, Mary Rocheleau, Nora Mueller, Anna M Barker, Kim M Nazi, Thomas K Houston, Barbara G Bokhour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy P HoganCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-0927
Tana M LugerCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-0776
Julie E VolkmanDivision of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5260-2973
Mary RocheleauCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3795-5735
Nora MuellerCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-7861
Anna M BarkerCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7662-9137
Kim M NaziVeterans and Consumers Health Informatics Office, Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-5602
Thomas K HoustonCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-4018
Barbara G BokhourCenter for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in the Veterans Health Administration, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8238-0745

Funding

HSRD VA PEC 13-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs information and communication technology is becoming more widely implemented across health care organizations, patient-provider email or asynchronous electronic secure messaging has the potential to support patient-centered communication. Within the medical home model of the Veterans Health Administration (VA), secure messaging is envisioned as a means to enhance access and strengthen the relationships between veterans and their health care team members. However, despite previous studies that have examined the content of electronic messages exchanged between patients and health care providers, less research has focused on the socioemotional aspects of the communication enacted through those messages.

objectiveRecognizing the potential of secure messaging to facilitate the goals of patient-centered care, the objectives of this analysis were to not only understand why patients and health care team members exchange secure messages but also to examine the socioemotional tone engendered in these messages.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional coding evaluation of a corpus of secure messages exchanged between patients and health care team members over 6 months at 8 VA facilities. We identified patients whose medical records showed secure messaging threads containing at least 2 messages and compiled a random sample of these threads. Drawing on previous literature regarding the analysis of asynchronous, patient-provider electronic communication, we developed a coding scheme comprising a series of a priori patient and health care team member codes. Three team members tested the scheme on a subset of the messages and then independently coded the sample of messaging threads.

resultsOf the 711 messages coded from the 384 messaging threads, 52.5% (373/711) were sent by patients and 47.5% (338/711) by health care team members. Patient and health care team member messages included logistical content (82.6%, 308/373 vs 89.1%, 301/338), were neutral in tone (70.2%, 262/373 vs 82.0%, 277/338), and respectful in nature (25.7%, 96/373 vs 33.4%, 113/338). Secure messages from health care team members sometimes appeared hurried (25.4%, 86/338) but also displayed friendliness or warmth (18.9%, 64/338) and reassurance or encouragement (18.6%, 63/338). Most patient messages involved either providing or seeking information; however, the majority of health care team member messages involved information provision in response to patient questions.

conclusionsThis evaluation is an important step toward understanding the content and socioemotional tone that is part of the secure messaging exchanges between patients and health care team members. Our findings were encouraging; however, there are opportunities for improvement. As health care organizations seek to supplement traditional encounters with virtual care, they must reexamine their use of secure messaging, including the patient centeredness of the communication, and the potential for more proactive use by health care team members.

Indexed as

CommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic MailFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered Careelectronic mailhealth communicationpatient-centered carepatient portalsveterans

Identifiers

PMID29519774
PMCPMC5864998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.