ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2018
10-Year Resource Utilization and Costs for Cardiovascular Care.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Improvements and Maintenance of Clinical and Functional Measures Among Rural Women: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities-2. 0 Cluster Randomized Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2022Trial
- Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Is a Biomarker of Red Cell Dysfunction Associated with Inflammation, Macrophage Polarization, and Coronary Artery Calcification: A Prognostic Marker in Cardiovascular Disease and a Potential Target for Anti-Cytokine Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pitavastatin in Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development, structure, and implementation of cardiometabolic clinics in the United States, with a focus on comprehensive patient care.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- The impact of follow-up care for patients presenting with non-typical chest pain at the emergency department.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Associations of the Zhejiang University (ZJU) index with cardiovascular diseases and mortality among US adults: a national cohort study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- A Model to Assess the Costs and Consequences of Changes in Diet and Nutrition From Potential Population-Wide Policies: The Microsimulation of Nutrition, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease (MONDAC).Preventing chronic disease · 2025Article
- Peak myocardial work assessment to detect coronary ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Elevated body roundness index increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in Chinese patients with circadian syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Patients' health care resources utilization and costs estimation across cardiovascular risk categories: insights from the LATINO study.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Risk-stratified analysis of long-term clinical outcomes and cumulative costs in Finnish patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization: a 5-year real-world study using electronic health records.European heart journal open · 2024Article
- Association of longitudinal trajectories of fasting plasma glucose with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among a Chinese older population: a retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Associations of trajectories in body roundness index with incident cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study in rural China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Lifetime healthcare expenses across demographic and cardiovascular risk groups: The application of a novel modeling strategy in a large multiethnic cohort study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- Association of body roundness index and its trajectories with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among a Chinese middle-aged and older population: A retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetic Study and Metabolite Identification of 1-(3'-bromophenyl)-heliamine in Rats.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of Implementation of HEART Chest Pain Protocol on Emergency Department Disposition, Testing and Cost.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) imparts a heavy economic burden on the U.S. health care system. Evidence regarding the long-term costs after comprehensive CVD screening is limited.
objectivesThis study calculated 10-year health care costs for 6,814 asymptomatic participants enrolled in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), a registry sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
methodsCumulative 10-year costs for CVD medications, office visits, diagnostic procedures, coronary revascularization, and hospitalizations were calculated from detailed follow-up data. Costs were derived by using Medicare nationwide and zip code-specific costs, inflation corrected, discounted at 3% per year, and presented in 2014 U.S. dollars.
resultsRisk factor prevalence increased dramatically and, by 10 years, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was reported in 19%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. Self-reported symptoms (i.e., chest pain or shortness of breath) were common (approximately 40% of enrollees). At 10 years, approximately one-third of enrollees reported having an echocardiogram or exercise test, whereas 7% underwent invasive coronary angiography. These utilization patterns resulted in 10-year health care costs of $23,142. The largest proportion of costs was associated with CVD medication use (78%). Approximately $2 of every $10 were spent for outpatient visits and diagnostic testing among the elderly, obese, those with a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level >3 mg/l, or coronary artery calcium score (CACS) ≥400. Costs varied widely from <$7,700 for low-risk (Framingham risk score <6%, 0 CACS, and normal glucose measurements at baseline) to >$35,800 for high-risk (persons with diabetes, Framingham risk score ≥20%, or CACS ≥400) subgroups. Among high-risk enrollees, CVD costs accounted for $74 million of the $155 million consumed by MESA participants.
conclusionsLongitudinal patterns of health care resource use after screening revealed new evidence on the economic burden of treatment and testing patterns not previously reported. Maintenance of a healthy population has the potential to markedly reduce the economic burden of CVD among asymptomatic individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.