Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518570›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Bayesian Optimisation of Large-Scale Biophysical Networks.

J Hadida, S N Sotiropoulos, R G Abeysuriya, M W Woolrich, S Jbabdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J HadidaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OHBA), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: jhadida@fmrib.ox.ac.uk.
S N SotiropoulosWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre (SPMIC), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
R G AbeysuriyaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OHBA), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
M W WoolrichWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OHBA), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
S JbabdiWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01186X/1Medical Research Council MR/K005464/1Medical Research Council MR/L009013/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between structure and function in the human brain is well established, but not yet well characterised. Large-scale biophysical models allow us to investigate this relationship, by leveraging structural information (e.g. derived from diffusion tractography) in order to couple dynamical models of local neuronal activity into networks of interacting regions distributed across the cortex. In practice however, these models are difficult to parametrise, and their simulation is often delicate and computationally expensive. This undermines the experimental aspect of scientific modelling, and stands in the way of comparing different parametrisations, network architectures, or models in general, with confidence. Here, we advocate the use of Bayesian optimisation for assessing the capabilities of biophysical network models, given a set of desired properties (e.g. band-specific functional connectivity); and in turn the use of this assessment as a principled basis for incremental modelling and model comparison. We adapt an optimisation method designed to cope with costly, high-dimensional, non-convex problems, and demonstrate its use and effectiveness. Using five parameters controlling key aspects of our model, we find that this method is able to converge to regions of high functional similarity with real MEG data, with very few samples given the number of parameters, without getting stuck in local extrema, and while building and exploiting a map of uncertainty defined smoothly across the parameter space. We compare the results obtained using different methods of structural connectivity estimation from diffusion tractography, and find that one method leads to better simulations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBrainBrain MappingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetoencephalographyNeural PathwaysBayesian optimisationBiophysical modelDiffusionMEGResting-stateSimulation

Identifiers

PMID29518570
PMCPMC6324723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.