Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518565›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Distinct phase-amplitude couplings distinguish cognitive processes in human attention.

Ravi V Chacko, Byungchan Kim, Suh Woo Jung, Amy L Daitch, Jarod L Roland, Nicholas V Metcalf, Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L Shulman, Eric C Leuthardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electrophysiological correlates of attention in the locus coeruleus-prelimbic cortex circuit during the rodent continuous performance test.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Spontaneous Beta Band Rhythms in the Predictive Coding of Natural Stimuli.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ravi V ChackoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States. Electronic address: ravi.chacko@wustl.edu.
Byungchan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.
Suh Woo JungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.
Amy L DaitchDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States.
Jarod L RolandDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.
Nicholas V MetcalfDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, PD, 35122, Italy.
Gordon L ShulmanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.
Eric C LeuthardtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63108, United States.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF HUMAN ATTENTIONR01MH096482 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO, LEUTHARDT, ERIC CLAUDE · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAMR25NS090978 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZIPFEL, GREGORY J · 2015 to 2023
$2.1M
Intracranial EEG and Electrical Stimulation of Deactivations in the Human BrainF32HD087028 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAITCH, AMY · 2016 to 2019
$132k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD087028NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096482NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS090978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial attention is the cognitive function that coordinates the selection of visual stimuli with appropriate behavioral responses. Recent studies have reported that phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of low and high frequencies covaries with spatial attention, but differ on the direction of covariation and the frequency ranges involved. We hypothesized that distinct phase-amplitude frequency pairs have differentiable contributions during tasks that manipulate spatial attention. We investigated this hypothesis with electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings from participants who engaged in a cued spatial attention task. To understand the contribution of PAC to spatial attention we classified cortical sites by their relationship to spatial variables or behavioral performance. Local neural activity in spatial sites was sensitive to spatial variables in the task, while local neural activity in behavioral sites correlated with reaction time. We found two PAC frequency clusters that covaried with different aspects of the task. During a period of cued attention, delta-phase/high-gamma (DH) PAC was sensitive to cue direction in spatial sites. In contrast, theta-alpha-phase/beta-low-gamma-amplitude (TABL) PAC robustly correlated with future reaction times in behavioral sites. Finally, we investigated the origins of TABL PAC and found it corresponded to behaviorally relevant, sharp waveforms, which were also coupled to a low frequency rhythm. We conclude that TABL and DH PAC correspond to distinct mechanisms during spatial attention tasks and that sharp waveforms are elements of a coupled dynamical process.

Indexed as

CuesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAttentionBrain WavesCerebral CortexElectrocorticographyEpilepsyHumansPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionCued attentionPhase-amplitude couplingReaction timeSharp waves

Identifiers

PMID29518565
PMCPMC6369928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.