Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518328›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018

Model Selection Using BICePs: A Bayesian Approach for Force Field Validation and Parameterization.

Yunhui Ge, Vincent A Voelz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Minimal Peptoid Dynamics Inform Self-Assembly Propensity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metal Cation-Binding Mechanisms of Q-Proline Peptoid Macrocycles in Solution.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reconciling Simulations and Experiments With BICePs: A Review.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in coarse-grained modeling of macromolecular complexes.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yunhui GeDepartment of Chemistry , Temple University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19122 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3946-1440
Vincent A VoelzDepartment of Chemistry , Temple University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19122 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1054-2124

Funding

Markov State Model approaches for folding, binding and designR01GM123296 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI VOELZ, VINCENT · 2017 to 2025
$3.1M
Computer Cluster for Computational Biology and BiophysicsS10OD020095 · OD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2015 to 2015
$442k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123296NIH HHS S10 OD020095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations (BICePs) algorithm reconciles theoretical predictions of conformational state populations with sparse and/or noisy experimental measurements. Among its key advantages is its ability to perform objective model selection through a quantity we call the BICePs score, which reflects the integrated posterior evidence in favor of a given model, computed through free energy estimation methods. Here, we explore how the BICePs score can be used for force field validation and parametrization. Using a 2D lattice protein as a toy model, we demonstrate that BICePs is able to select the correct value of an interaction energy parameter given ensemble-averaged experimental distance measurements. We show that if conformational states are sufficiently fine-grained, the results are robust to experimental noise and measurement sparsity. Using these insights, we apply BICePs to perform force field evaluations for all-atom simulations of designed β-hairpin peptides against experimental NMR chemical shift measurements. These tests suggest that BICePs scores can be used for model selection in the context of all-atom simulations. We expect this approach to be particularly useful for the computational foldamer design as a tool for improving general-purpose force fields given sparse experimental measurements.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBayes TheoremMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPeptidesThermodynamicsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID29518328
PMCPMC6473793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.