ReviewJournal of radiation research2018
Estimation of the effects of medical diagnostic radiation exposure based on DNA damage.
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Pathogenic Role of the DNA Double-Stranded Breaks in Hereditary Cardiomyopathies.Heart failure clinics · 2026Review
- Progress in Flexible and Wearable Lead-Free Polymer Composites for Radiation Protection.Polymers · 2024Review
- Cumulative Dose from Recurrent CT Scans: Exploring the DNA Damage Response in Human Non-Transformed Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Nanoceria as Safe Contrast Agents for X-ray CT Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients.Familial cancer · 2023Review
- Appropriateness of radiological diagnostic tests in otolaryngology.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- X-ray Shielding, Mechanical, Physical, and Water Absorption Properties of Wood/PVC Composites Containing Bismuth Oxide.Polymers · 2021Article
- Towards a Microwave Imaging System for Continuous Monitoring of Liver Tumor Ablation: Design and In Silico Validation of an Experimental Setup.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Paranasal Sinusitis Using Multi-View Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Use of Genotoxicity Endpoints as Biomarkers of Low Dose Radiation Exposure in Interventional Cardiology.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Strategy to reduce radiation exposure in postoperative spinal computed tomography scans.Surgical neurology international · 2021Review
- Fiberless Optogenetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Double-strand breaks in lymphocyte DNA of humans exposed to [EJNMMI research · 2020Article
- Quantification of DNA Double Strand Breaks and Oxidation Response in Children and Adults Undergoing Dental CBCT Scan.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Strange Case of Jekyll and Hyde: Parallels Between Neural Stem Cells and Glioblastoma-Initiating Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- RISK EVALUATION IN THE LOW-DOSE RANGE CT FOR RADIATION-EXPOSED CHILDREN, BASED ON DNA DAMAGE.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2019Review
- Multiple Organ Lesions in a Case of Contamination With Multiple Radionuclides After 38 Years.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-rays are widely applied in the medical field for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Among the uses of X-rays in diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) has been established as one of the most informative diagnostic radiology examinations. Moreover, recent advances in CT scan technology have made this examination much easier and more informative and increased its application, especially in Japan. However, the radiation dose of CT scans is higher than that of simple X-ray examinations. Therefore, the health risk of a CT scan has been discussed in various studies, but is still controversial. Consequently, the biological and cytogenetic effects of CT scans are being analyzed. Here, we summarize the recent findings concerning the biological and cytogenetic effects of ionizing radiation from a CT scan, by focusing on DNA damage and chromosome aberrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.