Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518178›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2018

A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study.

William O'Riordan, Alison McManus, Juri Teras, Ivan Poromanski, Maria Cruz-Saldariagga, Megan Quintas, Laura Lawrence, ShuJui Liang, Sue Cammarata, PROCEED Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01984684 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01984684 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMelinta Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled850ConditionsSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue InfectionsArmsdelafloxacin, vancomycin, aztreonam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Analysis of Pooled Phase III Efficacy Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Trial
  8. Analysis of Pooled Phase 3 Safety Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Trial
  9. Evaluation of in vitro activity of delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus MSSA and MRSA isolated from a Brazilian tertiary hospital.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  10. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  11. Delafloxacin: what does a new fluoroquinolone offer?Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

William O'RiordanE-study Site, Chula Vista, California.
Alison McManusE-study Site, Chula Vista, California.
Juri TerasNorth Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn.
Ivan PoromanskiPurulent-Septic Surgery Clinic, Multiprofile Hospital Active Treatment and Emergency Medicine, Pirogov EAD, Bulgaria.
Maria Cruz-SaldariaggaHospital Nacional Adolfo Guevara Velasco, Cusco, Peru.
Megan QuintasMelinta Therapeutics, Lincolnshire, Illinois.
Laura LawrenceMelinta Therapeutics, Lincolnshire, Illinois.
ShuJui LiangH2O Clinical, Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Sue CammarataMelinta Therapeutics, Lincolnshire, Illinois.
PROCEED Study Group
Melinta Therapeutics (United States) · USNational Institute of Emergency Medicine "Pirogov" · BGPrecision Research Institute · USNorth Estonia Medical Centre · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delafloxacin is an intravenous (IV)/oral anionic fluoroquinolone with activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic organisms. It is approved in the United States for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by designated susceptible gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, and is in development for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of 850 adults with ABSSSI compared delafloxacin 300 mg IV every 12 hours for 3 days with a switch to 450 mg oral delafloxacin, to vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV with aztreonam for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was objective response at 48-72 hours. Investigator-assessed response based on resolution of signs and symptoms at follow-up (day 14 ± 1), and late follow-up (day 21-28) were secondary endpoints. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the objective response was 83.7% in the delafloxacin arm and 80.6% in the comparator arm. Investigator-assessed success was similar at follow-up (87.2% vs 84.4%) and late follow-up (83.5% vs 82.2%). Delafloxacin was comparable to vancomycin + aztreonam in eradication of MRSA at 96.0% vs 97.0% at follow-up. Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups was similar. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation was higher in the vancomycin + aztreonam group (1.2% vs 2.4%). Conclusions: In ABSSSI patients, IV/oral delafloxacin monotherapy was noninferior to IV vancomycin + aztreonam combination therapy for both the objective response and the investigator-assessed response at follow-up and late follow-up. Delafloxacin was well tolerated as monotherapy in treatment of ABSSSIs. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01984684.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAztreonamCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSkin Diseases, BacterialTreatment OutcomeVancomycinYoung AdultAztreonamdelafloxacinFluoroquinolonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID29518178
PMCPMC6093995
OpenAlexW2790730042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.