Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518147›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

What seems to matter in public policy and the health of informal caregivers? A cross-sectional study in 12 European countries.

Laia Calvó-Perxas, Joan Vilalta-Franch, Howard Litwin, Oriol Turró-Garriga, Pedro Mira, Josep Garre-Olmo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recognizing the Unseen: Enhancing Family Caregiver Education in Morocco's Cancer Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laia Calvó-PerxasGirona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-504X
Joan Vilalta-FranchGirona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Howard LitwinPaul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oriol Turró-GarrigaGirona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Pedro MiraCentro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros, Banco de España, Madrid, Spain.
Josep Garre-OlmoGirona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ESUniversitat de Girona · ESBank of Spain · ESHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Europe, informal caregiving is frequent and is expected to grow. Caregiving has an impact on caregivers' health, but its effect may vary according to the policies of support that are available to caregivers. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the policies of support to caregivers available in 12 European countries and the health of caregivers, considering separately the policies based on financial help and those based on training and other non- financial services. We used data from 13,507 caregivers from 12 European countries from the fifth wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to build a path model. Poor health among caregivers was associated with living in a family-based care country (β = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.42-0.59), and with an increased extent of caregiving (β = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.15-0.22). Non-financial support measures seem to have a larger protective impact (β = -0.33; 95% CI = -0.38 - -0.28) on the health of caregivers than do financial support measures (β = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01-0.04), regardless of the gender of the caregiver. According to our results, the currently available policies of support associated with better health among caregivers are those that: 1) provide them with some free time, 2) help them to deal emotionally with caregiving, and 3) give them skills to both improve the care situation and to deal with it better.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth StatusPublic Health SurveillancePublic PolicyCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID29518147
PMCPMC5843287
OpenAlexW2792591341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.