Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29518118›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

An analytical comparison of three immunoassay platforms for subpicomolar detection of protein biomarker GAD65.

Olivier R Costa, Katrijn Verhaeghen, Sarah Roels, Geert Stangé, Zhidong Ling, Daniel Pipeleers, Frans K Gorus, Geert A Martens

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier R CostaDepartment of Clinical Biology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-5819
Katrijn VerhaeghenDepartment of Clinical Biology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Sarah RoelsCenter for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes, Brussels Free University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Geert StangéCenter for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes, Brussels Free University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Zhidong LingCenter for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes, Brussels Free University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Daniel PipeleersCenter for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes, Brussels Free University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Frans K GorusDepartment of Clinical Biology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Geert A MartensCenter for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes, Brussels Free University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Center for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A disproportional increase of circulating GAD65 within hours from an intraportal islet allotransplantation has been validated as biomarker of beta cell loss and poor functional outcome. More sensitive assays are, however, needed to allow detection of episodes of subtle beta cell loss during late-stage graft rejection or in the peri-onset period of type 1 diabetes. We applied the same sandwich monoclonal antibody couple reactive towards the C- and N-terminus of GAD65 on three advanced immunoassay platforms-the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA, Becton, Dickinson and Company), ElectroChemiLuminescence ImmunoAssay (ECLIA, Meso Scale Discovery) and digital ELISA technology (Single Molecule Array-SIMOA, Quanterix. We then compared analytical performance (linearity, imprecision, limit of detection and functional sensitivity), correlation of results, and practicality. All evaluated techniques showed linearity up to at least 500 ng/dL (76.9 pmol/L). SIMOA achieved the lowest imprecision. The 3 platforms correlate well with each other and could all detect subpicomolar concentrations of GAD65 in plasma, but only SIMOA and CBA could quantify down to that range. SIMOA can achieve the highest sample throughput. The three methods tested allow sensitive detection of GAD65, but SIMOA appears best suited for automated quantification of subpicomolar concentrations.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood Chemical AnalysisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansImmunoassayRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersGlutamate Decarboxylaseglutamate decarboxylase 2Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29518118
PMCPMC5843250
OpenAlexW2792100012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.