ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Ten simple rules to create a serious game, illustrated with examples from structural biology.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical recommendations from a multi-perspective needs and challenges assessment of citizen science games.PloS one · 2023Article
- Developing a Video Game as an Awareness and Research Tool Based on SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiological Dynamics and Motivational Perspectives.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for designing analogue science games.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Scientific Discovery Games for Biomedical Research.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2019Article
- Molecular modelling as the spark for active learning approaches for interdisciplinary biology teaching.Interface focus · 2019Article
- Developing Theory-Driven, Evidence-Based Serious Games for Health: Framework Based on Research Community Insights.JMIR serious games · 2019Review
- The CrowdWater game: A playful way to improve the accuracy of crowdsourced water level class data.PloS one · 2019Article
- Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.