ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2018
MR-assisted PET motion correction in simultaneous PET/MRI studies of dementia subjects.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using U-Nets to Predict the Effects of Head Motion on Simulated Specific Absorption Rate for Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Parallel Transmission.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Scanner-integrated reconstruction versus post-processing deep learning for low-countEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Effects of List-Mode-Based Intraframe Motion Correction in Dynamic Brain PET Imaging.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- Current Trends and Applications of PET/MRI Hybrid Imaging in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Normal Aging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Motion-correction strategies for enhancing whole-body PET imaging.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Markerless head motion tracking and event-by-event correction in brain PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Preliminary Exploration of Pseudo-CT-Based Attenuation Correction for Simultaneous PET/MRI Brain Imaging in Nonhuman Primates.ACS omega · 2023Article
- PET/MRI in practice: a clinical centre survey endorsed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the EANM Forschungs GmbH (EARL).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Brain imaging of sequential acquisition using a flexible PET scanner and 3-T MRI: quantitative and qualitative assessment.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Assessment of motion and model bias on the detection of dopamine response to behavioral challenge.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022Article
- Rigid motion-resolvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multicontrast MR images.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Low-count whole-body PET with deep learning in a multicenter and externally validated study.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Review
- Specific absorption rate implications of within-scan patient head motion for ultra-high field MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Dose Reduction in Brain [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020Review
- Zero Echo Time MRAC on FDG-PET/MR Maintains Diagnostic Accuracy for Alzheimer's Disease; A Simulation Study Combining ADNI-Data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Methods for Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics in the Living Brain With PET Imaging.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSubject motion in positron emission tomography (PET) studies leads to image blurring and artifacts; simultaneously acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data provides a means for motion correction (MC) in integrated PET/MRI scanners. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of realistic head motion and MR-based MC on static [ STUDY TYPE: Observational study. POPULATION: Thirty dementia subjects were recruited. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T hybrid PET/MR scanner where EPI-based and T ASSESSMENT: Head motion parameters estimated from high temporal resolution MR volumes were used for PET MC. The MR-based MC method was compared to PET frame-based MC methods in which motion parameters were estimated by coregistering 5-minute frames before and after accounting for the attenuation-emission mismatch. The relative changes in standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) between the PET volumes processed with the various MC methods, without MC, and the PET volumes with simulated motion were compared in relevant brain regions. STATISTICAL TESTS: The absolute value of the regional SUVR relative change was assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level, comparing the values obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods as well as across different motion groups. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods was also assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level.
resultsMC had a greater impact on PET data quantification in subjects with larger amplitude motion (higher than 18% in the medial orbitofrontal cortex) and greater changes were generally observed for the MR-based MC method compared to the frame-based methods. Furthermore, a mean relative change of ∼4% was observed after MC even at the group level, suggesting the importance of routinely applying this correction. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs was also decreased using MR-based MC. All comparisons were significant at the P = 0.05 level. DATA
conclusionIncorporating temporally correlated MR data to account for intraframe motion has a positive impact on the FDG PET image quality and data quantification in dementia patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1288-1296.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.