ArticleMedicine2018
Effectiveness of revascularization interventions compared with medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review protocol.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Stature Growth Complications in β-thalassemia Major Patients.Annals of global health · 2021Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention compared to medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Machine learning-driven prediction of medical expenses in triple-vessel PCI patients using feature selection.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Economical Evaluation of Cancer Types Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ischemic heart disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2020Article
- Comparing the effectiveness of revascularization interventions with medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiomyopathies is a group of heart diseases that directly affects the heart muscle, and their causes is not just high blood pressure, congenital and pericardial diseases but ischemic cardiomyopathy disease are also caused by vascular disorders, and to confirm the diagnosis, angiography is required. There are several methods for treating and controlling ischemic cardiomyopathy in world health systems and especially in the Iran health system, which include medical treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
methodsThis systematic review will includes observational and interventional studies in English and Persian languages and evaluates effectiveness of revascularization interventions and medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Animal studies will not be considered. In this systematic review, our sources of information will be electronic databases, trial registries, and different types of grey literature. An electronic search is performed through PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, NHS Economic Evaluations Database. To integrate the results of studies with similar results, meta-analysis will be used, for which Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software will be used. Results are provided using relative risk with a 95% confidence interval for information.
resultsThe results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this systematic review will be the first to evaluate existing research on the effectiveness of revascularization interventions compared with medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The review will benefit patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.