ArticleMedicine2018
Minimal invasive nonfusion technique for the treatment of noncontiguous lumbar burst fractures in young age patient: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanded Indications for Hybrid Spinal Fixation Systems; Combined Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and Open Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of multiple-level noncontiguous spinal fractures.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Surgical management and outcomes analysis of lower lumbar (L3-L5) burst fractures: A single-center experience and meta-analysis.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleIn the treatment of noncontiguous lumbar burst fractures, there still remains controversy over proper surgical procedures. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 19-year-old female patient visited our hospital after fall down from 3 m high. DIAGNOSES: Initial neurologic examination revealed an incomplete spinal cord injury characterized by hypoesthesia and motor grade of 2 below the L2 segment. Lumbar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated L2 and L5 burst fractures severely obliterating the spinal canal.
interventionsShe underwent emergent PSSPSF at L1-2-3 and L4-5-S1 following bilateral L1 and L4 laminotomy with reduction of bony fragments by tapping method. OUTCOMES: She was gradually recovered and able to walk with assistance two weeks after surgery. Removal of implants was performed at 12 months after surgery. Follow-up radiography showed well-preserved segmental motion and adequate decompressed spinal canal with fused fractured bony fragment. She returned to her normal daily activities without any neurologic deficits and pain. LESSONS: Noncontiguous burst fracture of the lumbar spine is an unusual injury. For the adequate management in patient with neurologic deficit, reduction of the fractured body and stabilization of vertebral column is necessary. It is also important to preserve the segmental motion in young age patients. From that point of view, temporary PSSPSF with spinal canal decompression is considered as minimal invasive surgery with significant low morbidity, providing stability with motion saving and good clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.