Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29517520›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Chelsea M Blankenship, Lisa L Hunter, Douglas H Keefe, M Patrick Feeney, David K Brown, Annie McCune, Denis F Fitzpatrick, Li Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Ins and Outs of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth: A Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  5. The outcomes of an audiological management programme for neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ultra-High Frequency Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions for Detection of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea M BlankenshipCommunication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lisa L Hunter
Douglas H KeefeBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
M Patrick FeeneyNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.
David K BrownCommunication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Annie McCuneDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Denis F FitzpatrickBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Li LinResearch in Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USBoys Town National Research Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

WIDEBAND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF MIDDLE-EAR AND COCHLEAR FUNCTIONR01DC010202 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI FEENEY, MARTIN PATRICK, HUNTER, LISA LEIGH · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to analyze distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level and signal to noise ratio in a group of infants from birth to 4 months of age to optimize prediction of hearing status. DPOAEs from infants with normal hearing (NH) and hearing loss (HL) were used to predict the presence of conductive HL (CHL), sensorineural HL (SNHL), and mixed HL (MHL). Wideband ambient absorbance was also measured and compared among the HL types.

designThis is a prospective, longitudinal study of 279 infants with verified NH and HL, including conductive, sensorineural, and mixed types that were enrolled from a well-baby nursery and two neonatal intensive care units in Cincinnati, Ohio. At approximately 1 month of age, DPOAEs (1-8 kHz), wideband absorbance (0.25-8 kHz), and air and bone conduction diagnostic tone burst auditory brainstem response (0.5-4 kHz) thresholds were measured. Hearing status was verified at approximately 9 months of age with visual reinforcement audiometry (0.5-4 kHz). Auditory brainstem response air conduction thresholds were used to assign infants to an NH or HL group, and the efficacy of DPOAE data to classify ears as NH or HL was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two summary statistics of the ROC curve were calculated: the area under the ROC curve and the point of symmetry on the curve at which the sensitivity and specificity were equal. DPOAE level and signal to noise ratio cutoff values were defined at each frequency as the symmetry point on their respective ROC curve, and DPOAE results were combined across frequency in a multifrequency analysis to predict the presence of HL.

resultsSingle-frequency test performance of DPOAEs was best at mid to high frequencies (3-8 kHz) with intermediate performance at 1.5 and 2 kHz and chance performance at 1 kHz. Infants with a conductive component to their HL (CHL and MHL combined) displayed significantly lower ambient absorbance values than the NH group. No differences in ambient absorbance were found between the NH and SNHL groups. Multifrequency analysis resulted in the best prediction of HL for the SNHL/MHL group with poorer sensitivity values when infants with CHL were included.

conclusionsClinical interpretation of DPOAEs in infants can be improved by using age-appropriate normative ranges and optimized cutoff values. DPOAE interpretation is most predictive at higher F2 test frequencies in young infants (2-8 kHz) due to poor test performance at 1 to 1.5 kHz. Multifrequency rules can be used to improve sensitivity while balancing specificity. Last, a sensitive middle ear measure such as wideband absorbance should be included in the test battery to assess possibility of a conductive component to the HL.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceArea Under CurveEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearingHearing LossHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousReference Values

Identifiers

PMID29517520
PMCPMC6127008
OpenAlexW2792477224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.