Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29517492›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Quantitative assessment of cervical softening during pregnancy in the Rhesus macaque with shear wave elasticity imaging.

Ivan M Rosado-Mendez, Lindsey C Carlson, Kaitlin M Woo, Andrew P Santoso, Quinton W Guerrero, Mark L Palmeri, Helen Feltovich, Timothy J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Equilibrium Mechanical Properties of the Nonhuman Primate Cervix.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan M Rosado-MendezMedical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0778-1260
Lindsey C CarlsonMedical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7940-1373
Kaitlin M WooBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Andrew P SantosoMedical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-4475
Quinton W GuerreroMedical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-7791
Mark L PalmeriBiomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-0050
Helen FeltovichMaternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Provo, UT, United States of America.
Timothy J HallMedical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-6031
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USDuke University · USIntermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Monitoring Changes in Cervical Microstructure During PregnancyR01HD072077 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2013 to 2022
$6.1M
Data commons for 'omic, microscopy and analysis core facilitiesS10OD018164 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRAY, GREGORY A. · 2014 to 2014
$598k
Quantifying Cervical Softness with Elasticity ImagingR21HD063031 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2010 to 2011
$415k
Detecting changes in cervical microstructure with quantitative ultrasoundR21HD061896 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2009 to 2010
$395k
Characterizing Human Uterine Cervix Using Quantitative Ultrasound and MicroscopyF31HD082911 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARLSON, LINDSEY C. · 2016 to 2017
$64k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD082911NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072077NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD061896NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD063031NIH HHS S10 OD018164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal parturition, e.g. pre- or post-term birth, is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and increased economic burden. This could potentially be prevented by accurate detection of abnormal softening of the uterine cervix. Shear wave elasticity imaging (SWEI) techniques that quantify tissue softness, such as shear wave speed (SWS) measurement, are promising for evaluation of the cervix. Still, interpretation of results can be complicated by biological variability (i.e. spatial variations of cervix stiffness, parity), as well as by experimental factors (i.e. type of transducer, posture during scanning). Here we investigated the ability of SWEI to detect cervical softening, as well as sources of SWS variability that can affect this task, in the pregnant and nonpregnant Rhesus macaque. Specifically, we evaluated SWS differences when imaging the cervix transabdominally with a typical linear array abdominal transducer, and transrectally with a prototype intracavitary linear array transducer. Linear mixed effects (LME) models were used to model SWS as a function of menstrual cycle day (in nonpregnant animals) and gestational age (in pregnant animals). Other variables included parity, shear wave direction, and cervix side (anterior versus posterior). In the nonpregnant cervix, the LME model indicated that SWS increased by 2% (95% confidence interval 0-3%) per day, starting eight days before menstruation. During pregnancy, SWS significantly decreased at a rate of 6% (95% CI 5-7%) per week (intracavitary approach) and 3% (95% CI 2-4%) per week (transabdominal approach), and interactions between the scanning approach and other fixed effects were also significant. These results suggest that, while absolute SWS values are influenced by factors such as scanning approach and SWEI implementation, these sources of variability do not compromise the sensitivity of SWEI to cervical softening. Our results also highlight the importance of standardizing SWEI approaches to improve their accuracy for cervical assessment.

Indexed as

Cervical RipeningAnimalsCervix UteriElasticityElasticity Imaging TechniquesElectromagnetic PhenomenaFemaleGestational AgeMacaca mulattaModels, AnimalPregnancyPregnancy, AnimalSound

Identifiers

PMID29517492
PMCPMC5908736
OpenAlexW2792946814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.