Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516408›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2018

Recognizing Gynecological Cancer in Primary Care: Risk Factors, Red Flags, and Referrals.

Garth Funston, Helena O'Flynn, Neil A J Ryan, Willie Hamilton, Emma J Crosbie

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Focused Clinical Review of Lynch Syndrome.Cancer management and research · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garth FunstonCentre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. gf272@doctors.org.uk.
Helena O'FlynnCentre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neil A J RyanGynaecological Oncology Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Willie HamiltonExeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Emma J CrosbieGynaecological Oncology Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-054Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-009Medical Research Council MR/M018431/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of symptomatic gynecological cancer is likely to improve patient outcomes, including survival. The primary care practitioner has a key role to play in this-they must recognize the symptoms and signs of gynecological cancer and make prompt evidence-based decisions regarding further investigation and referral. However, this is often difficult as many of the symptoms of gynecological cancers are nonspecific and are more likely to be caused by benign rather than malignant disease. As primary care is generally the first point of patient contact, those working in this setting usually encounter cancer patients at an earlier, and possibly less symptomatic, stage than practitioners in secondary care. Despite these challenges, research has improved our understanding of the symptoms patients present to primary care with, and a range of tests and referral pathways now exist in the UK and other countries to aid early diagnosis. Primary care practitioners can also play a key role in gynecological cancer prevention. A significant proportion of gynecological cancer is preventable either through lifestyle changes such as weight loss, or, for cervical cancer, vaccination and/or engagement with screening programs. Primary care provides an excellent opportunity to discuss cancer risk with patients and to promote risk reduction strategies and lifestyle change. In this article, the first in a series discussing cancer detection in primary care, we concentrate on gynecological cancer and focus on the three most common forms that a primary care practitioner is likely to encounter: ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer. We outline key risk factors, briefly discuss prevention and screening strategies, and offer practical guidance on the recognition of symptoms and signs and the investigation and referral of women with suspected cancer. While this article is written from a UK primary care perspective, much of what is discussed will be of relevance to those working in other healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Physician's RoleEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLife StyleOvarian NeoplasmsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsUnited KingdomUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCancer detectionCancer diagnosisCancer preventionCancer referralsCervical cancerEndometrial cancerGeneral practiceOncologyOvarian cancerPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID29516408
PMCPMC5910472
OpenAlexW2791496520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.